• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Fodera Guitars Introduces the Imperial Mini-MG

TalkBass

News Poster
Mar 12, 2004
1,626
3,441
Designed in collaboration with Fodera artist and good friend, Matthew Garrison, the Mini-MG marks the next innovative chapter in bass guitar design. With the recent change in instrument travel regulations, there has been an increasing need for a bass guitar that combines portability without sacrificing tone or playability. With these needs in mind, Fodera and Matt collaboratively set out to design an instrument that could fit in any typical airplane overhead storage bin. With its 30.75” scale length and 16.5mm string spacing, the Mini-MG is our most compact bass guitar and is, in fact, small enough to fit in a regular electric guitar gigbag!

It has been our experience that headless instruments often lack in tonal response when compared to their full-size siblings. In order to prevent this, we hand-selected medium weight Walnut and Alder along with a highly select-grade 3-piece Hard Rock Maple neck, while also increasing the thickness of the body, to retain necessary mass.

Although the Mini-MG is tuned E-C, Matt specifically requested a drop tuner be incorporated into the bass to allow for drop-tuning to a low B. In order to accommodate this, our team designed a counter-sunk, modified D-tuner, with a reduced string post, in order to provide a sufficient break angle for the E-string. This provides a tight and responsive sound and feel to the string despite the 30.75” scale-length. By utilizing this design, we were also able to add back precious mass to the “head-side” of the instrument – further increasing its tonal response.

The Mini-MG’s neck-through design offers increased sustain and resonance, with a sculpted heel to provide effortless playing and ergonomics over the entire length of the neck. For electronics, the Mini-MG comes loaded with our proprietary Fodera / Seymour Duncan Dual Coil Pickups and features a 4-band version of our Fodera / Pope Standard preamp offering unlimited tonal flexibility as well as a full bypass / passive mode. The pickups are placed in our Matt Garrison pickup spacing (bridge pickup placed in a sweet spot between 60’s and 70’s spacing) and an ebony ramp rounds out the top to help facilitate the fast and light playing style that Matt has become known for.

"The new mini performed beyond anything I could have imagined.
Tone, feel, power, ease of use, portability... "

"What I really enjoyed was that after we had finished, we sat at a table and signed CD's, and folks came up to me trying to place their finger on what they had just experienced...The way I see it, if most folks that don't event know about what this bass can deliver are so emotionally moved by what can happen, imagine how this new little beast will be perceived in the bass world."


- Matt Garrison

We will be offering a limited run of 10 Imperial Mini-MGs in the customer’s choice of our hand-rubbed, satin finish in Black, Fiesta Red or Olympic White for delivery starting January of 2017. Each bass will come with a custom gig bag, a complimentary set of custom Fodera Strings (appropriately sized for the Mini-MG), and a signed certificate of authenticity. The list price for the Imperial Mini-MG is $11,650.00

IMG_2792-Edit.jpg

IMG_2769.jpg IMG_2792-Edit.jpg IMG_2874.jpg IMG_2942.jpg IMG_2964.jpg IMG_2967-Edit.jpg
 
"It has been our experience that headless instruments often lack in tonal response when compared to their full-size siblings"
err...well Fodera....you probably haven't been making them correctly. I've used and built many headed and headless basses and I've NEVER found any headless builds to be lacking in tonal response. While it's fair to say they sound a little different (similar to how the bolt on vs all though debate goes), it's not fair to generalist with the statement that the intrinsically lack tonal response. I have a word for that statement and it's not polite.

Seriously....$11.5K for a short scale headless bass...I think the guys at Fodera are from another planet.
 
"It has been our experience that headless instruments often lack in tonal response when compared to their full-size siblings"
err...well Fodera....you probably haven't been making them correctly. I've used and built many headed and headless basses and I've NEVER found any headless builds to be lacking in tonal response. While it's fair to say they sound a little different (similar to how the bolt on vs all though debate goes), it's not fair to generalist with the statement that the intrinsically lack tonal response. I have a word for that statement and it's not polite.

Seriously....$11.5K for a short scale headless bass...I think the guys at Fodera are from another planet.
That's what I call a sense of humour!
That said; I guess they would have done their market research and done the numbers before going into a project like this.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Honch and GMC
For 11.5 K you can buy additional SEAT ticket for your regular bass, and lots of them, if you still have your regular sized Squier, or Fodera for that matter. Do they think anyone who pays 11.5 K for any instrument will fly economy class and stow it in the overhead bin?

I already have headless basses at 34" that fits pretty well in any regular guitar gig bag. You can't stow it in overhead bin at flights, but I don't need to. 30.7 scale with the option to drop to low B? No I think I'll pass. Dingwalls in that case...I don't even know if Dingwall has any bass at 11.5 K regardless of how many fancy options to choose.

The Klein guitar though, headless, fit very well into any overhead bin in it's gig bag. My friend has one, and has never had a problem. It's almost like they seek a problem that doesn't exist: "Do you DARE to check in your bass at 11.5K?!?!?" Better not check it in with luggage and take it with you onboard. Symphonic orchestras checks in all their expensive gear. Kubickis take on it is better...

Yes, I agree, one can wonder what they have been smoking...? Does such bad weed exists even? For ANY price?;)
 
I dig it, agree about the headstock's lack of aesthetic consideration, and also the price. It seems, on the face of it, absurd. It seems like a superb sounding instrument though.
 
"It has been our experience that headless instruments often lack in tonal response when compared to their full-size siblings"
err...well Fodera....you probably haven't been making them correctly. I've used and built many headed and headless basses and I've NEVER found any headless builds to be lacking in tonal response. I have a word for that statement and it's not polite.

Seriously....$11.5K for a short scale headless bass...I think the guys at Fodera are from another planet.

I couldn't agree more. Never ever heard of a "headless" tone on/of any bass. If there's something, it's on the contrary.
So now there's going a plethora of headless tones, Fodera thinks? Like there's some common denominator for headless sounds? Like graphite necked headless has the same sound and character as wooden ones? It should be that the dreaded dead spot at the g-string 4-5th fret, is gone. Makes people confused, they want that lack of tonal response of a dead spot neck... ;) perhaps.

I have word for that statement, and it's polite. BS. Considering what I really think, it's polite. I am corteous even. Holding back. Fodera and MG has too much weed on their hands, and are in debt to their drug dealers by now, and wants to cash in, so they can pay their debts.

It seems.

Make a bet? 30 seconds into trying that instrument out, I will find flaws and minor/major gaffes, that will deep six any "headless lack in tonal response". You know all from my obsessive compulsive things around here on TB, with neck diving, body diving, dead spots, balance, variation pickups, output, the most nitpicky minor things no one else could think of. You bet, at 11.5 K I will find them at the drop of a hat. I'll give you some right now I've detected on the spot:

1. Output jack at the front? no way jose. no neutrik locking?
2. Only two screws to adjust pickups? No way jose. I want at least four!
3. As well for the ramp in between pickups. Would like it combined with a proper thumbrest/rest stroke stop too, along to go over the pickups.
4. The mechanism at the back of the "headpiece" or "headstock"? C'mon would be much better where the tuning mechanisms are already at the bridge.
5. Since it seems active/passive and runs with batteries.. where's the battery department? Do you have to screw all screws off the back plate to swap batteries? C'mon, at 11.5 K this is either a joke/prank or an insult. I would like to have the battery hatch in the middle of the backplate, because there seem to be much space underneath. A lid in the lid so to speak.
6. What's the point of having a drop B tuner at the E-string ONLY? You have to tune down all the other ones as well then. "Manually" with the tuners at the bridge. Each one of them. No one plays with drop B and the rest of strings tuned regularly. Where's their heads at? B-A-D-G-C tuning? Beats me.
7. Switches right behind the pots? So you have to make that jump over the knobs if to switch them? Can you see their positions from playing position when looking down? Doesn't the vol/tone knob obscure the switch? No way Jose! Take a good look at this, and think for yourself a little bit:

img-2856.jpg


Is there something I like then? Well, I don't mind the color.;)

They should've called up Ned Steinberger as a consultant, for advice, and straighten them up.
 
Last edited:
While it may suit MG to a tee, I use my pinky on the picking hand for when adjusting vol and tone levels. You know just as you would do volume swells on a guitar, and have two fingers holding the pick while using the pinky to turn up the volume (or down). While I don't use a pick, I am doing this anyway. With this construction you'd bump into the switches AS WELL AS THE cord input plug that gets in the way. I e the output jack and switches are placed too close to the rest of the controls. If they are dual concentric knobs, even if you don't use the pinky, and both picking fingers to turn on them, you'll running the risk of knocking the switches out of position, as well as if you use a sturdy cable plus it might turn out to thick so it's no room for the fingers to grip the controls firmly.
 
Last edited:
"It has been our experience that headless instruments often lack in tonal response when compared to their full-size siblings"
err...well Fodera....you probably haven't been making them correctly. I've used and built many headed and headless basses and I've NEVER found any headless builds to be lacking in tonal response. While it's fair to say they sound a little different (similar to how the bolt on vs all though debate goes), it's not fair to generalist with the statement that the intrinsically lack tonal response. I have a word for that statement and it's not polite.

Seriously....$11.5K for a short scale headless bass...I think the guys at Fodera are from another planet.
For $11,500.00 I'd expect that thing to keep my wife happy too...;)
But seriously, if you can justify spending $11.5 grand on a mini-bass I'd think you're in the class of players who could probably afford the cartage for normal size gear. Just my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Honch