TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Nope, it originally looked exactly like the Fender headstock. The neck was redesigned and Leo designed the new headstock at the same time. that was about 83/84.
I thought G&L always used the same headstock design. Prove me wrong then?
Just because you haven't heard of a band, doesn't make them irrelevant. Try using those savage keyboard warrior skills on doing a search next time you don't know something.
Well, okay, but it looked closer than anything else and the new design, according to Leo, was to avoid possible lawsuits. So, if the guy who designed both thought they were very similar, who am I to argue?Ok,
It never looked like the Fender headstock. Maybe a wider version of the Tele headstock, kinda, but it was never close enough to get confused.
No matter, the hook doesn't bother me.
True. I believe it's a mid 80's G&L actually. Still G&L nonetheless.Yeah, but he uses one with the old headstock.
+1... The story I've heard was Fender attempted to sue G&L over their head stock design because it was too similar to a Fender head stock. The point was added to represent G&L giving the middle finger to Fender...
Terrible necks. Stupid and bad sounding electronics. Heavy. Not pretty. ... urine color. And it was heavy and had a terrible neck and tried to fool ya with a jazz look.
.
Just because you haven't heard of a band, doesn't make them irrelevant. Try using those savage keyboard warrior skills on doing a search next time you don't know something.
Well....he would say that.....Wouldn't he?....
Usually when I have nothing constructive to add to a conversation I keep my mouth shut and listen. That way I don't come off looking arrogant and foolish.I was kidding. I really haven't heard of them though. Is this a trigger for you? Would you like to talk about it?
