i know, but i've gotta sell some stuff to raise that kinda cash and i only paid 675 for my L2k
Last edited:
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
i know, but i've gotta sell some stuff to raise that kinda cash and i only paid 675 for my L2k
In my case, the LB100 sounded good, but not great with the stock strings.
Based only on looking at the strings that come stock, I believe that G&L uses D'Addario nickel-plated round wounds, which I usually have on my Fenders. For whatever reason, I just didn't care for them on the LB100. They sounded overly bright to me. Whether using fingerstyle or pick, those Chromes just seem to fit what I want from this bass.
I'm very happy with my '94. A heavy girl but has the 60's P thump. Shines with flats of course.
Years back I was in a power pop three piece. Used rounds exclusively with a pick at times. Sizzling.Flats! I should try em although I use the LB-100 for punk & it excels at it
Years back I was in a power pop three piece. Used rounds exclusively with a pick at times. Sizzling.
I've had my 2014 LB-100 for a few months now, courtesy of the TB Classifieds. It is a beautifully made instrument with a well-proportioned #12 neck and rosewood fretboard. Plays itself, pretty much. Very lively and resonant. A pleasure to play for extended periods.
I'm rocking GHS Precision Flats. Compared with my Fenders, the G&L sounds a bit brighter. I strongly prefer old school thump, so I'm thinking of changing strings and possibly the capacitor. The voicing of the pickup is similar to Fender's CS60 with a strong fundamental and lots of sweet harmonics, but the 0.022 cap makes the tone too bright for me through most of the range of the tone control.
That little quibble aside, this bass is a keeper!
Once you go flat, you'll never go back! I play exclusively fingerstyle, though I have experimented with a pick. You'll get a percussive attack that should sound plenty aggressive on the LB-100. You mentioned Chromes earlier. They are on the brighter side for flats. Also, they have high tension that ought to work well with a heavy pick.I'm thinking of putting flats on my LB-100 with maple. Is it still aggressive for rock with a pick or is flats with a pick a no go? Never had flats!
Once you go flat, you'll never go back! I play exclusively fingerstyle, though I have experimented with a pick. You'll get a percussive attack that should sound plenty aggressive on the LB-100. You mentioned Chromes earlier. They are on the brighter side for flats. Also, they have high tension that ought to work well with a heavy pick.
I had to Google it. Never tried 'em. I can vouch for Sadowsky, La Bella and GHS. Not a fan of Chromes due to the brightness--but that could be just the ticket for you. Let us know what you go with and how they compare to the stock strings on the LB-100!How about Group III flats?
I'm rocking GHS Precision Flats... I strongly prefer old school thump, so I'm thinking of changing strings and possibly the capacitor.
Did some quick research chromes vs ghs . will try the ghs for more old school vibe. Thanks!Give the GHS flats time to settle in. They are a go-to flat for old school thump.
Jason at Bass Strings Online is a TB member. If you open a VIP account (go to the website, message him and mention TB), he'll cut you an unbeatable price. No affiliation.Did some quick research chromes vs ghs . will try the ghs for more old school vibe. Thanks!