TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
if you're a "touring band" and only getting $150-$200 a show, that's not really a "tour." More like "putting mediocrity in motion."
Since when is throwing your gear into a van and driving off to self booked low paying gigs in far away cities considered a "tour"?
?I realized years ago that a music career was not profitable for most musicians ... It makes a great hobby but I can make more money as an architect.
What other business do you invest in thousands of dollars of equipment and spend years learning your trade and then you get to the bar early and set up. Then you play for hours and tear down. Finally you get home a 4am with $150 or $200 in your pocket. That is not a fast track to prosperity.
Argh. A whole article on gas prices and music, and there is NO mention of whether or not the band lobbied for more money so that it could continue to play the gigs it had planned to play!!! It would be nice to see any instance where a band did in this kind of situation did the logical thing that everyone else does (bar owners, produce growers, etc, etc, etc...) and raise the price of their services/products. Or at least try. Everyone else is charging more. Why shouldn't the musician? Why do we have to effectively take a pay cut for our services, while all the other vendors/suppliers involved in all aspects of a night at a typical club raise theirs to meet financial needs?
So I think a band should be paid more with higher gas prices. The club owner will continue to have their planned entertainment for that night, instead of a sub or last minute act. This would presumably be better entertainment and not throw the patrons for a loop "Hey, I think Johnny and the Wingnuts, from Chicago, were supposed to be here tonight?!?!?!?" (or whatever the name...). And on the other end, the band scheduled to play has some financially based incentive to keep going on the tour as planned.
Or it may be the "reality" that the clubs simply don't need you, or any musician. At all. In that case, there can be no bargaining or rationalizing increased fees. But how do you know if you don't have that conversation with the club owner?????
I'm just frustrated that musicians don't seem to stick up for themselves in business matters/financial matters. But hey, I could be wrong. There may be some huge movement of working musicians who are playing the local bars/clubs and who are successfully getting more money. Anyone? Ferris? Buehler? Anyone?
I took it as they're making (clearing after expenses and payroll) about $150 to $200 a show.
Most the blues gig pay out 65 to 80 bucks and you play on average 3 1 hour sets.and its very cut throat too.