• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join free Log in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

GB Shuttle 6.2 vs. Aguilar TH500???

Which would you choose?

  • Aguilar TH500

    Votes: 45 45.9%

  • Genz Benz Shuttle 6.2

    Votes: 53 54.1%
  • Total voters
    98
#3
I'd probably be very happy with either one, but the TH might be better for me. I love GB and Aguilar and I don't think you can go wrong with either one.

I definitely wouldn't mind gigging with either head for a few weeks to decide what I like better.
 
#8
I had a DB751 and a SM12.0, sold both
then got myself a couple more Aguilar

just so you know my priority isn't weight,
otherwise I would have to think a lot harder
but the Aguilar matches my tone a lot better

OTOH, I absolutely love the CS of Genz Benz
another example that you can't always have it all
 
#11
Hmm... So far people who have written a response favor the shuttle and poll voters favor the TH. That probably says something about the personality of the players on some level. Not really... Just sayin. I like that many are torn between the two. I probably favor the shuttle because it seems ever so slightly better for upright.
 
#15
I'm quite familiar with both, and currently own the TH500.

I had a nice opportunity to spend my time with the new Shuttle 6.2 when they first came out, and it is a VERY nice upgrade to the original 6.0..... bigger down low, more gain, and the voicing buttons have been tweaked to make them seem a little less extreme, and as a result, more useable.

These two heads are similar in quality, reliability and support, and also overall volume, but the tone and feel are very different.

The Shuttle 6.2 now sounds very similar the the Shuttle 9/9.2. So, a bit bright up top, very tight and controlled down low. You can push the tube preamp to grind a bit, but I would still describe the voice of this amp as 'modern, quick, bright and clean' without being clinical. Very nice 'all around' amp .

The TH500 has a somewhat similar front end (regarding the knobs/controls)... both heads have a single semi-parametric mid control, standard shelving bass and treble contols, and then a 'filter' section (with the Genz having three filter buttons and the Aguilar having a drive control).

The TH500 is very, very fat and big down low, quite a bit more relaxed up top, and seems to have more inherent midrange distortion (on purpose). The drive control in conjuction with the gain control actually results in more 'warmth/growl/grind' variations than the gain/volume tube front end of the Genz.

The Genz allows you to hear 'the windings on the E string'... lots of upper harmonic content that is not masked by a big low end. The TH500 is just the opposite... massive, tubey, fat, round low end, nice punchy mids, and a very relaxed organic top end that, similar to the DB750, can kind of disappear in a mix.

To oversimplify.... like a P Bass with fats..... TH500 all the way. Like to slap a J Bass, it would be the Genz 6.2 Of course, each had can be used for any style and instrument, but that, to me, is the 'vibe' of each of these heads.
 
#18
KJung said:
I'm quite familiar with both, and currently own the TH500.

I had a nice opportunity to spend my time with the new Shuttle 6.2 when they first came out, and it is a VERY nice upgrade to the original 6.0..... bigger down low, more gain, and the voicing buttons have been tweaked to make them seem a little less extreme, and as a result, more useable.

These two heads are similar in quality, reliability and support, and also overall volume, but the tone and feel are very different.

The Shuttle 6.2 now sounds very similar the the Shuttle 9/9.2. So, a bit bright up top, very tight and controlled down low. You can push the tube preamp to grind a bit, but I would still describe the voice of this amp as 'modern, quick, bright and clean' without being clinical. Very nice 'all around' amp .

The TH500 has a somewhat similar front end (regarding the knobs/controls)... both heads have a single semi-parametric mid control, standard shelving bass and treble contols, and then a 'filter' section (with the Genz having three filter buttons and the Aguilar having a drive control).

The TH500 is very, very fat and big down low, quite a bit more relaxed up top, and seems to have more inherent midrange distortion (on purpose). The drive control in conjuction with the gain control actually results in more 'warmth/growl/grind' variations than the gain/volume tube front end of the Genz.

The Genz allows you to hear 'the windings on the E string'... lots of upper harmonic content that is not masked by a big low end. The TH500 is just the opposite... massive, tubey, fat, round low end, nice punchy mids, and a very relaxed organic top end that, similar to the DB750, can kind of disappear in a mix.

To oversimplify.... like a P Bass with fats..... TH500 all the way. Like to slap a J Bass, it would be the Genz 6.2 Of course, each had can be used for any style and instrument, but that, to me, is the 'vibe' of each of these heads.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the detailed response! I might need to buy both and send one back. That's dangerous because I'll probably want to keep both. :)
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom
Back