A few thoughts FWIW:
When I got to college in 1990 my bass teacher was Jeff Halsey. He had what was the gold standard amp set up of the time: a Walter Woods, two Bose Speakers, and an Underwood pick up. He had incredible chops and played loud. His bass growled so much that I hated sitting in on it because it felt completely out of my control. Jeff’s playing was 100% adapted to the aesthetic of the time. Don’t get me wrong, he could get his sound without the amp, but his playing was informed and fully adapted to how the bass was amplified back then. Incidentally, Tommy Flanagan loved Jeff’s playing and wanted him to go on the road but Jeff didn’t want to leave his teaching gig…
I hear George Mraz as the bassist possibly most adapted to, or even created by that sound. Rufus Reid, is another one. Listen to him on those last Live Stan Getz records. He’s cranked and playing soft, not just dealing with it, but fully adapted. Marc Johnson and NHOP too. They came of age with that technology. It wasn’t a compromise, it was cool AF! It’s much tougher for me to listen to and accept the sound of Older players in the 70’s and 80’s. Sam Jones or Ray Brown came up one way then had to adapt or “deal with it”. Ron Carter arguable made the biggest change out of all those guys.
I can’t really separate George Mraz and some of those other greats from that time/sound. It’s interesting to be here now when we talk about the (Fishman/Underwood) piezo as being objectively bad. It’s worth trying to sit down and listen to it as if it’s the absolute coolest thing, just to try to get some perspective.