My P-Bass isn’t my #1 player, but I’ve had the same set of PressureWound strings on it since 2008...
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Finally giving the Balanced Nickels a shot. I really wanted to like the Pressurewounds but they didn't quite do it for me. Hoping BNs are the answer. Really like 7150s and Chicago Style Nickels so hoping these are the 'one'.
I tried the light set (40-101) on my P bass once. Agreed about "huge, fat lows" and "very smooth mids", but I didn't find them to be "very supple" as such. In fact, I was pleasantly surprised how firm (not stiff) they felt for a round core after trying a few of the DR round cores. They stayed on the P bass for eight months, during which time their tonal quality didn't change much at all. They had a nice presence in the mix.Balanced Nickels: Huge, fat lows. Very smooth mids. VERY supple feel (round core). For MY taste they were a bit TOO supple, and although they sounded very nice out of the box they mellowed out and became a bit too dull sounding for my taste, and it happened relatively fast. They were lacking the midrange presence I needed to hear myself properly on stage. Also, the tone isn't really what I think of as a "pure nickel tone". They sound more like some kind of pure nickel/nickel plated steel hybrid to me. In fact, based on the tone I wouldn't have been surprised if only the outermost wrapping was pure nickel, but if GHS says they're pure nickel I guess I'll have to believe them.
I tried the light set (40-101) on my P bass once. Agreed about "huge, fat lows" and "very smooth mids", but I didn't find them to be "very supple" as such. In fact, I was pleasantly surprised how firm (not stiff) they felt for a round core after trying a few of the DR round cores. They stayed on the P bass for eight months, during which time their tonal quality didn't change much at all. They had a nice presence in the mix.
By the way, GHS is only clear about the "final cover" being pure nickel; they actually don't say anything about the material for the inner layers.
Based on my experience, the "rollerwinding method" has far more practical benefit than the "balanced construction", at least for me personally.I've always been curious about both rollerwound strings and strings with 2 wraps on all strings, so this thread is really useful.
Pure nickel is pure nickel... that's the material used for the outer winding.Very interesting. If they specifically only refer to the "final cover" I have a VERY strong feeling that the GHS Balanced Nickels aren't pure nickel...
Not if only the final wrapping is pure nickel. Then it's a hybrid string. I'm not saying the Balanced Nickels ARE a hybrid string, because I really don't know, but based on the tone and what you just explained in a previous post I strongly suspect it. There's nothing wrong with that, it's just a bit different.Pure nickel is pure nickel...
The round cores by GHS are definitely firmer in feel than the round cores by DR. I would say the BN 40-101 are fairly close to the Bassics 40-102 in overall playing feel.How would the tension on the BN light set compare to say a 40-100 hexcore round?
I thought the tension would be more due to the pure nickel material. All but one of my basses currently have La Bella 760FX or GHS Precision Flats light gauge. One has the Bassics in 40-102. I was planning on switching one of my basses with flats to the light gauge Balanced Nickels. Looks like the tension should be there or thereabouts.The round cores by GHS are definitely firmer in feel than the round cores by DR. I would say the BN 40-101 are fairly close to the Bassics 40-102 in overall playing feel.
One thing about the pure nickel is it's a denser and heavier metal than nickel-plated steel and takes more tension (as in pulling weight) to be tuned up to pitch. The BN 40-101 weigh in at 173 lbs., while the Bassics 40-102 are only 153 lbs. in total tension.
“Probably the biggest misconception around pure nickel strings is that the finished string itself is “pure nickel,” core and all. It’s not. Nickel isn’t strong enough to hold up to the rigorous demands placed on core wire or plain strings, as it’s a much softer metal. If you made a nickel-core string, strung it up, and bent it, it would just stay bent and hang off the fretboard. That’s no good. Therefore, pure nickel strings always feature stainless steel cores and steel plain strings, just like nickel wound/nickel-plated steel strings do.”Not if only the final wrapping is pure nickel. Then it's a hybrid string. I'm not saying the Balanced Nickels ARE a hybrid string, because I really don't know, but based on the tone and what you just explained in a previous post I strongly suspect it. There's nothing wrong with that, it's just a bit different.
I was not referring to the core. The core is obviously steel. I was referring to the multiple layers of wrapping, where the outer wrapping can be pure nickel, while the inner wrapping(s) can be steel or nickel plated steel.“Probably the biggest misconception around pure nickel strings is that the finished string itself is “pure nickel,” core and all. It’s not. Nickel isn’t strong enough to hold up to the rigorous demands placed on core wire or plain strings, as it’s a much softer metal. If you made a nickel-core string, strung it up, and bent it, it would just stay bent and hang off the fretboard. That’s no good. Therefore, pure nickel strings always feature stainless steel cores and steel plain strings, just like nickel wound/nickel-plated steel strings do.”
Which set? I have played all the Pressurewound and BN sets. The Pressurewound sets that most people play are the L 44-102or ML 44-106 sets. Both of these sets have more tenson than the BN 40's 4L, but less tension than the BN 44's 4M.I have found the Pressurewounds to be a bit higher tension than the BN.