• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Gibson Grabber

It was a total flop in its day, though its better brother the Ripper is making a comeback of sorts. Its only bigtime user was Gene Simmons. I'd get it if the guy offered to sell it for $300, otherwise I'd pass.
 
I never tried one but i was going to get one, but now im getting a P-Bass. I just cant really deal with a bass that could have a broken neck because ive banged up my Jazz head stock a little and im suprised there are no scratches on it.
 
The Grabber, with its sliding pickup, was, in my opinion, crap, but the Grabber 3, with 3 pups was better. I think they were single coils, if I recall correctly. (I was young -- I didn't know a single coil from a humbucker from third base :eyebrow: ) Like almost all the basses I've had and gotten rid of, I wish I had it back.

It wasn't the brightest bass around, but I used it primarily for jazz, and often had it strung with tapewounds, so it didn't matter to me.
 
There is an old school musician that used to hang out next door at the repair shop next to my folks house, who was all about gear. Anyway, my brother and I went to his house one day in search of a tele for him. He had like 12 Jazz basses, some CIJ some MIA and other assorted old school goodies, and then he had a Grabber in the corner and I told him how much I liked it and he said that's all he plays at home when he practices he loves the sound he gets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedVee
I bought my Grabber really cheap a while back. It was a great bass even though it had a broken truss rod and a big lump in the neck. It had a certain growl to it. The sliding pickup really didn't do anything but at least Gibson tried something new. I guess the theory behind it was that you can get a bridge, middle, and neck position all with one pickup. It was a cool bass though.
 
Hey Andy,

I played one with the sliding pickup in the mid 80s. This was 5 piece 50s/60s show-band. We did lots of visual gags and the guitar player loaned me his Grabber to avoid dinging up my P-bass. Anyhoo....I played it every Friday and Saturday night, 5 sets a night (I was much younger then), for 3 years and that thing took a pounding, literally, and kept right on tickin!

It was good enough for the time and the gig but it was nothing special. I'd take my P or Warmoth J for pure sound any day. I've never been much of a Gibson Bass guy as I rember those awful sounding EBOs and EB3s from the 70s......YAK!

Just my opinion.

PD
 
I bought a Grabber in the mid 70s, the first bass I ever purchased. The Ripper was the one I really wanted but, since I couldn't afford it, the Grabber was my next choice. I actually think the sliding pickup is a neat idea in theory. IIRC the slogan was "forward for a deep roar, back for a clean punch" but it never seemed to make any difference in the tone on that bass. It wasn't very versatile tonally and, like another poster said, not the brightest of basses but it wasn't muddy either. I played that bass until it was stolen in the early 80s. Frankly, I don't miss it. Every bass I've had since has been better. It wasn't bad, just nothing special. I owned a G3 for a little while and I thought it was a better instrument.

I recently saw a Grabber for sale and I think it was $800 (3 times what I paid for mine). I would never buy one at that price, there is better stuff around. All it has going for it is the Gibson name.
 
Ed from Thrice seems to love his Grabber, though it has undergone a few mods

http://alchemyindex.com/?p=45

I followed the posted URL and it's nice to hear from true lovers of the Grabber. I have the Grabber G3 and totally worked it over. Plenty of range in sound and sexy looking instrument ( sunburst ). Not as hot or clean as others might be. It's a good jazz bass.

I will eventually pick up a jazz or P bass and will have my two favourites.