• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

GK Combo Shootout...MB210 vs. MB212

More positive news on the MB212! Thanks for sharing all this info. I can't find much anything else on this combo other than this thread.

I'm hoping they get one in at the GC I can try. Thanks for the info on the break in period. Kinda hard to tell what its gonna sound like in a loud store before its broken in. Hopefully I can get a good idea though.

How's it at low levels? I see you got the little GB rig for low volume practice. But does this combo sound okay at the same low volumes?
 
More positive news on the MB212! Thanks for sharing all this info. I can't find much anything else on this combo other than this thread.

I'm hoping they get one in at the GC I can try. Thanks for the info on the break in period. Kinda hard to tell what its gonna sound like in a loud store before its broken in. Hopefully I can get a good idea though.

How's it at low levels? I see you got the little GB rig for low volume practice. But does this combo sound okay at the same low volumes?
You're welcome, that's why I started this thread.

It doesn't change character or anything after break-in. It just has more low-end, which could be dialed in when you demo it by raising the 'bass' knob by an 'hour' on the clock face. (did that make sense?)

At low levels it sounds fine. I like the tone from the MB212 much more than the 3.0-10T....I just needed something to fit a very small space at home for practice or for a super-low volume gig.
 
You're welcome, that's why I started this thread.

It doesn't change character or anything after break-in. It just has more low-end, which could be dialed in when you demo it by raising the 'bass' knob by an 'hour' on the clock face. (did that make sense?)

At low levels it sounds fine. I like the tone from the MB212 much more than the 3.0-10T....I just needed something to fit a very small space at home for practice or for a super-low volume gig.

Gotcha on the break in. Just a little more "give" if you will. Bumping the bass a bit makes sense. I gotta give the guy a shout. But going outta town this weekend, so may miss it.

I went from a jam room a couple years ago to a "jam corner" and its tight for a 4x10 and 1x12 next to it (can't stack b/c of a shelf). So the combo would sit in that spot and have some room left for other toys. (Electric drums? some mics, stand, etc.) Tight though, so like the idea of the lightweight and powah!!
 
Gotcha on the break in. Just a little more "give" if you will. Bumping the bass a bit makes sense. I gotta give the guy a shout. But going outta town this weekend, so may miss it.

I went from a jam room a couple years ago to a "jam corner" and its tight for a 4x10 and 1x12 next to it (can't stack b/c of a shelf). So the combo would sit in that spot and have some room left for other toys. (Electric drums? some mics, stand, etc.) Tight though, so like the idea of the lightweight and powah!!
Yikes....an MB212 would RULE in a corner, with all that wall and floor and ceiling to conduct the lows!
 
Yikes....an MB212 would RULE in a corner, with all that wall and floor and ceiling to conduct the lows!

Right!!! Actually, the wood floor is over a crawl space so its just like a boomy stage. My 112 sounds best when propped on the spring-loaded tilt back handle I installed on the bottom.

I am a little concerned that the MB212 would be total overkill for quiet practices. I'm just tired of the 4x10 taking up precious space and rarely getting used. But if/when I need it, its ready.
 
Right!!! Actually, the wood floor is over a crawl space so its just like a boomy stage. My 112 sounds best when propped on the spring-loaded tilt back handle I installed on the bottom.

I am a little concerned that the MB212 would be total overkill for quiet practices. I'm just tired of the 4x10 taking up precious space and rarely getting used. But if/when I need it, its ready.
It WOULD be total overkill for quiet practices, luckily you can turn it down and it still sounds awesome.

I would highly recommend an Auralex Gramma Pad in your situation. Also, the MB210 would probably be too much low end for your application, glad you're thinking about the MB212. (sounds wrong doesn't it?) :)
 
I have been watching this thread for a while and I feel it it is time for me to comment. Two months ago I bought my MB210 after I sold my SWR Silverado 2X12 combo, Triad, Ampeg B2R and SVT 4x10 HLF. I was just simply tired of the weight. So I made my purchase and I couldn't be happier. The MB 210 is very loud but not loud enough for all situations that I faced so I paired it with the only cab I had left and that was a Hartke 410xl and it gave me the stage presence that I needed. I have decided to buy the MBE 4x10 when it becomes available. This way I will be covered for small or large gigs.
 
It WOULD be total overkill for quiet practices, luckily you can turn it down and it still sounds awesome.

I would highly recommend an Auralex Gramma Pad in your situation. Also, the MB210 would probably be too much low end for your application, glad you're thinking about the MB212. (sounds wrong doesn't it?) :)

Cool that it sounds good at low volume. Definitely a plus!

I was thinking about maybe some castors, but doesn't seem like they would be needed on 39lbs!. I have another tilt back handle (came two to the pack), so I could do that too. May need to put bigger feets :p on the bottom or add washers - something to make it clear the handle when not in use (not recessed; screws right on)

Man, it seems a little weird to even think about selling my Epi/LMII gear.

edit: I'm a little concerned about the tweeter, as I like to thump and pluck and a slap n pop every now and again. The Epifani has a super sweet tweeter for that there.
 
Cool that it sounds good at low volume. Definitely a plus!

I was thinking about maybe some castors, but doesn't seem like they would be needed on 39lbs!. I have another tilt back handle (came two to the pack), so I could do that too. May need to put bigger feets :p on the bottom or add washers - something to make it clear the handle when not in use (not recessed; screws right on)

Man, it seems a little weird to even think about selling my Epi/LMII gear.

edit: I'm a little concerned about the tweeter, as I like to thump and pluck and a slap n pop every now and again. The Epifani has a super sweet tweeter for that there.
I've got some lightweight 3" casters on mine and love them. Put'em on there because of a long load-in and physical issues. They also help decouple the amp from boomy stages...like a Gramma Pad.

This GK stuff sounds completely different than the LMII/Epi setup. I agree 100% about the Epi tweeters....beautiful and musical. The tweeter on these combos isn't even in the same ballpark. If you love your rig that you have now, I'd be surprised if you liked the sound of the MB212. You really need to play through one before getting too serious about it IMO.

What don't you like about your LMII/Epifani rig? Is it just the weight? When I had that rig, I found it didn't cut very well at all.

YMMV

:)
 
So I had my first gig with the MB210 this past weekend. My band tends to practice at good volumes so its been more than able to handle practice, and it sounds good at low volumes also.

The place was huge, probably could have handled 400 people easily. There were maybe 100ish there, so a good amount of empty space in the back. This place does line dancing one night of the week so their dancefloor is huge and ceilings are very very tall.

My settings: gain, 10ish, boost, 9, master 11. More than enough stage volume although I always run through the mixer for PA support, but halfway through the first set we turned me down in the mixer just a tad.

I play in a cover band and use a programmable sansamp as my floor preamp and I use the DI out from the preamp. The preamp gives it the exact sound that I want and makes the tone a little fuller and deeper from the amp.

My settings on the amp are treble at noon, mid hi at 2, low high at 1, and bass at 10-11ish. I have the amp set at what I thought was a flat and balanced EQ, and then I use my bass and sansamp to tweak it.

I was thinking about getting the 210 extension speaker when it came out for larger gigs but after this last gig and not needing to put the master past 12:00, and keeping the gain and boost both low, Im debating even the need for the extension cabinet.

Im sure the QSC K12 mains help disperse my sound, but overall the amp sounded fantastic.

Ive complained about the hissy tweeter, but I was practicing before the show and for some reason I turned the tweeter on and it was dead silent. Played a few slap riffs, did Higher Ground as a sound check sond and it sounded fantastic, so I played the entire show with the tweeter on and it sounded great.

HOWEVER, when I bypass the sansamp, I can hear a huge difference in tone and the sansamp also gives me a little gain. Right now, Im essentially using the amp as a powered bass speaker because I use the EQ on my SR700 bass or the sansamp to control the tone. Id definately need to tweak the EQ on the amp if I didnt have the sansamp, so I could see how some people might not be able to get the exact tone they want from the amp by just running their bass directly into it. So of course, YMMV.

I have a clean tube bass, the SVT bass sound, and then a distorted bass. Right now my setup is a breeze. I have my sansamp and a tuner pedal on a small board which I have an aluminum carrying case for which I also put my cables in which has a shoulder strap. I can do one trip loading with the MB210 in one hand, the bass in its case in the other, and then the aluminum case with my 2 pedals and cables over my shoulder.

My back and ears are VERY VERY happy.
 
Has anyone considered replacing the tweeter in their MB series? I'm not fond of the tone either but have been wondering if its the way it is EQ'd and not the tweeter itself. Any thoughts?
That's a good idea if you like everything ELSE about the amp. Of course my solution is to turn it off, but lots of folks like their tweeters.

So I had my first gig with the MB210 this past weekend. My band tends to practice at good volumes so its been more than able to handle practice, and it sounds good at low volumes also.

The place was huge, probably could have handled 400 people easily. There were maybe 100ish there, so a good amount of empty space in the back. This place does line dancing one night of the week so their dancefloor is huge and ceilings are very very tall.

My settings: gain, 10ish, boost, 9, master 11. More than enough stage volume although I always run through the mixer for PA support, but halfway through the first set we turned me down in the mixer just a tad.

I play in a cover band and use a programmable sansamp as my floor preamp and I use the DI out from the preamp. The preamp gives it the exact sound that I want and makes the tone a little fuller and deeper from the amp.

My settings on the amp are treble at noon, mid hi at 2, low high at 1, and bass at 10-11ish. I have the amp set at what I thought was a flat and balanced EQ, and then I use my bass and sansamp to tweak it.

I was thinking about getting the 210 extension speaker when it came out for larger gigs but after this last gig and not needing to put the master past 12:00, and keeping the gain and boost both low, Im debating even the need for the extension cabinet.

Im sure the QSC K12 mains help disperse my sound, but overall the amp sounded fantastic.

Ive complained about the hissy tweeter, but I was practicing before the show and for some reason I turned the tweeter on and it was dead silent. Played a few slap riffs, did Higher Ground as a sound check sond and it sounded fantastic, so I played the entire show with the tweeter on and it sounded great.

HOWEVER, when I bypass the sansamp, I can hear a huge difference in tone and the sansamp also gives me a little gain. Right now, Im essentially using the amp as a powered bass speaker because I use the EQ on my SR700 bass or the sansamp to control the tone. Id definately need to tweak the EQ on the amp if I didnt have the sansamp, so I could see how some people might not be able to get the exact tone they want from the amp by just running their bass directly into it. So of course, YMMV.

I have a clean tube bass, the SVT bass sound, and then a distorted bass. Right now my setup is a breeze. I have my sansamp and a tuner pedal on a small board which I have an aluminum carrying case for which I also put my cables in which has a shoulder strap. I can do one trip loading with the MB210 in one hand, the bass in its case in the other, and then the aluminum case with my 2 pedals and cables over my shoulder.

My back and ears are VERY VERY happy.
VERY cool Philter! Your settings are very similar to what i use with the MB210. I think that gives you as close to a neutral sound as possible with this amp. I'll bet you're getting quite a bit of gain from your pedal....those volume settings would be pretty quiet without a gain stage in front pushing the amp.

It's all about working with gear until you get what YOU need out of it. :bassist:
 
VERY cool Philter! Your settings are very similar to what i use with the MB210. I think that gives you as close to a neutral sound as possible with this amp. I'll bet you're getting quite a bit of gain from your pedal....those volume settings would be pretty quiet without a gain stage in front pushing the amp.

It's all about working with gear until you get what YOU need out of it. :bassist:

I do get some gain from the sansamp, but my level for each channel on the sansamp is between 9 and 12:00. So Im not pushing it as far as I could.

We do some acoustic songs, and when we do those, I bypass the sansamp so its just bass going through the MB210 and it is a drop in volume and tone, which tends to mix perfectly with an acoustic guitar.

This combo definately isnt for everyone but for anyone using a similar setup to me, where you have a preamp shaping your tone, this amp is working perfectly.

But if you are playing in a thrash metal band and want some serious overdrive in the preamp stage, then this probably isnt your combo. (and you probably shouldnt even be looking for a combo)

And I agree, its about working with gear until you get what you want. Which is why I try to post as much info about what I play, my style/genre, and what my setup is.

I wrote a comparison when I first got these amps between the BA115hpt I had, the MB212, and the MB210.

After spending time and a gig with the MB210, I have some additional thoughts:

I play in a cover band and we tend to play at a moderate volume level. My bass is an Ibanez SR700. In past gigs with the Ampeg BA115HPT, I could plug my bass directly into that amp and get a warm clean sound with oodles of tone. My sound was full and I think thats due to the tube preamp section. But as a con, that amp was only 220 watts and it was heavy as heck. For gigs, I had to set the EQ to boosted and the master volume level at 8, so I was pushing the amp up to its limits so I needed something louder.

For the MB212 and MB210, they are solid state preamps so if you are looking for a warm, fuller, tubey sound, you need to get that through a preamp pedal.

For me, being in a cover band and needing to change from a warm tubey sound to an SVT sound to a distorted bass sound from song to song makes a floor programmable preamp mandatory and essentially Im using a flat EQ on the amps preamp and using it as a lightweight portable powered bass combo. All my tone is coming from my bass EQ and my sansamp.

AND if you are getting your tone from your bass's preamp or another preamp before going into the MB210 or MB212, then you will probably notice no difference in sound and could easily EQ both combo's to probably sound pretty identical. So if you are going that route, then the subtle differences in tone between the 210 and 212 are negligible. And then the decision making process would probably be:

- Are you on a budget? Then the 210 is the way to go.
- Can you afford the 212 and need all 500 watts? Then the 212 is the way to go.
- Can you afford an amp and an extension cabinet and want the maximum volume from your combo? Then the 210 with an extension cabinet is the way to do.

For people who are in original bands and have one sound, you really need to play through these amps to see if they are going to be a good match for your needs. Power and portabilitywise, there isnt any competition on the market at this pricepoint. Just make sure its got the sound you are looking for. If it doesnt, a preamp could probably do the trick and give you the sound you are looking for, in a lightweight, small, portable, high powered and low cost combo.

As a side note, Im thrilled that I got the MB210 because it can fit into my G37. With my BA115HPT, I always needed to take my wife's SUV to gigs. Now, because I have a small combo, my aluminum case for my pedal board and cables, and my bass in its case, everything can fit easily into my small backseat and trunk.
 
Lots of good points made there Philter.

Quick SS response works for me, even though I'm in a cover band as well. The Boost control gives me enough 'tubeyness'...I've played through Ampegs that were so slushy it was hard to play in time.

I'm surprised at how many people are considering buying these combos, usually if you're needing high-volume, a combo isn't the way to go. The folks who have been disappointed are probably asking for too much from a little lightweight combo.

The MB212 remains the biggest bargain in my book, since it will 'almost' replace a head + 410 cab. (of course the MB210+ext.cab is louder) The outdoor gig I did convinced me that this little monster is quite capable....and the 'not so good' DI turned into a positive when they miked the amp and it sounded heavenly (IMO).

At this same gig the gain got turned from the normal noon setting to 2:00 and I was amazed at how much 'bigger' it sounded! Even when reducing the master to return the overall volume to tolerable levels.
 
How would you compare the 212 sound to a GK800. I have used a GK800 for 25 years, but I like the 38lbs and one trip idea. Looking to lose some lbs.; with GK800 tone, sound. With money not an issue, what amp or combo sounds most similar to the old GK800.

Thanks,

Chuck
 
Chuck, I played through an 800RB for 20 years, so I understand your love for that amp. Going from memory, the MB115 might be more like the 800RB because it has less of that big fat low end that the other two have. (I didn't play through the MB115 very long at the store, so don't put too much weight on that)

Ranking them in ascending order, from least boomy to most boomy it would be: MB115..MB212..MB210 Make sense? Nope.

I hope you can try them out and find one that works for you.

PS - Good to see another lefty on here. ;)
 
I have been watching this thread for a while and I feel it it is time for me to comment. Two months ago I bought my MB210 after I sold my SWR Silverado 2X12 combo, Triad, Ampeg B2R and SVT 4x10 HLF. I was just simply tired of the weight. So I made my purchase and I couldn't be happier. The MB 210 is very loud but not loud enough for all situations that I faced so I paired it with the only cab I had left and that was a Hartke 410xl and it gave me the stage presence that I needed. I have decided to buy the MBE 4x10 when it becomes available. This way I will be covered for small or large gigs.


Cool. TY for the feel-good story! :bassist: It is indeed a new age for us bass players, weight-wise.

--Bomb :bassist:
 
Thanks TallBoy, I went back to my old GK800 for a gig last night after a month with a SD800 and a much welcome back sound. Played a Yamaha TRB5 (Lefty) and an Agi GS212 instead my SWR Goliath III and it sounded great; although the SWR sounds better with this setup. But at 59 the additional 30lbs of the SWR feels like alot more. I leaning towards the MB210 because is easier to hear at close range set on top of a cabinet. I'm hoping the sound is similar to a GK800. Thanks again, are you lefty?
 
Thanks TallBoy, I went back to my old GK800 for a gig last night after a month with a SD800 and a much welcome back sound. Played a Yamaha TRB5 (Lefty) and an Agi GS212 instead my SWR Goliath III and it sounded great; although the SWR sounds better with this setup. But at 59 the additional 30lbs of the SWR feels like alot more. I leaning towards the MB210 because is easier to hear at close range set on top of a cabinet. I'm hoping the sound is similar to a GK800. Thanks again, are you lefty?
Dude, I used to have an SD800...didn't dig it. I'd call it the opposite of an 800RB....wide and uber-clean. Also used to have a TRB-IIL (yes, lefty)....it was a very nice bass. The MB210 is the only choice for you if you need something to stack. Just know that you'll be pulling out LOTS of low-end...the MB210 is the least 800RB-sounding of the three IMO.