TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
The GK is in another tier with the price to match. The VT200 combos I've played were all quite noisy but weren't the VT500 so take it for what it's worth. The GK MB115 I had at the time was silent.
Hi all,
Trying to decide between these two amps, playing through a Barefaced BB2. Heard great things about both, just can't decide! I play loud rock, similar to Rage Against The Machine.
Would welcome any advice from those who have experience with them
Thanks
The only negative I've seen put on it, and I tend to agree, is the DI output is variable. It will go up and down with the master volume, level, control.
Beyond my pay grade.Break the warranty likely, but that might not be a difficult mod to fix.
The VT500s aren't made in the US. Never have been. Even with that, I agree. It's a great amp.I would very respectfully disagree about the VT500 being in a lesser tier than GK, they are both built in the USA, both are killer at what they do. As shoot-r stated, the GK has really full lows, crisp highs and are lightning fast response-wise, and the VT500 is the most gnarly kind of tubey, gritty tone with big lows (the grit can be pulled back) that sounds just awesome. Two very different beasts, both great heads.
I would very respectfully disagree about the VT500 being in a lesser tier than GK, they are both built in the USA, both are killer at what they do.
I would very respectfully disagree about the VT500 being in a lesser tier than GK, they are both built in the USA, both are killer at what they do. As shoot-r stated, the GK has really full lows, crisp highs and are lightning fast response-wise, and the VT500 is the most gnarly kind of tubey, gritty tone with big lows (the grit can be pulled back) that sounds just awesome. Two very different beasts, both great heads.
I would very respectfully disagree about the VT500 being in a lesser tier than GK, they are both built in the USA, both are killer at what they do. As shoot-r stated, the GK has really full lows, crisp highs and are lightning fast response-wise, and the VT500 is the most gnarly kind of tubey, gritty tone with big lows (the grit can be pulled back) that sounds just awesome. Two very different beasts, both great heads.
Respectfully disagree. Simulation of other amps is what the VT500 was made to do, and with just turning a few dials and pushing a button. No signal chain manipulation needed. Or not.While your comparison is somewhat apples/oranges, I’d suggest that with the right signal chain the GK can cover sonics very similar to the VT but it might not work as well trying to get the VT to cover what the GK can do.