• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

GK MB500 vs 400RB IV

Hey all,

I'm trying to figure out why the new GK MB500 is the same price as the 400RB IV. The MB500 appears to be more powerful and is smaller and lighter with more features (headphone jack, foot switch, separate volume for boost,...) than the 400RB IV. So why isn't it more expensive? What am I missing?

Thanks in advance for sharing your collective knowledge!

Best,
Dave
 
Just a personal preference but I would pick any of the RB heads over the MB series heads any day. The 700RB-II is my all time favorite GK head. It's destined to be a classic IMO.

Big +1. The 700 is one of the better amps I've owned and still consider picking another one up.

I played an MB800 for awhile and it was stupid loud but just didn't have the growl or predictable EQ of the RB series.
 
I'm having a much different experience with my MB500. My 1001RB died a fiery death at a Halloween gig, very fitting. I'd been seriously considering the MB500 for a while and decided to pull the trigger. I'm extremely happy with the tone (and growl) I'm getting out of it. So much so that I'm not going to replace the 1001RB as I originally intended. It's not identical, but for a live application, it's close enough. The fact that it fits in my gig bag is a huge plus as well. I didn't A/B them (because of the fire thing) but it definitely has the GK sound I like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Signs