• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Grain. Besides asthetics do you consider your choice for any other reason?

Feb 28, 2016
693
1,084
Kansas
I'm currently looking at a fiver, an Ibanez BTB33NTF. Several choices are available and I noticed right off, side by side, the extreme differences on the top pieces. Some being very tight grain and others being a much more open, wide pattern. Kind of thick for "Laminate" but that still may be the term used, I'm as far from a luthier as you can get (obviously).

Are there any inherent differences in resulting tone that any of you have experienced and are there any reasons to avoid one or the other as far as cracking, splitting etc. in the long run?

This all may be insignificant but I'm curious. I expect since there are so many choices in wood grain, the big name builders don't seem to be too concerned. I've never been curious enough to care until now. I usually go by first impression as far a looks being a "part" of the deciding factor.

Any input would be appreciated.
 
Buy the best looking one.

Also, some of the online sellers will let you see pics of the actual bass rather than a cherry-picked stock photo.

I'm pretty sure Sweetwater photographs (and sets up) EVERY guitar that goes into their inventory. They don't display all of them on their website, but may be able to show you options if you call or email.
 
Wood by nature is greatly variable from piece to piece, but a sound seasoned body blank is going to give you the desired result, a stable body.
People will argue for days over other things a given piece of wood may bring to the finished product, but all other factors being relatively equal, go for the one that is pleasing to your eye.