I owned two and have since moved on from them. The NYC PJ that I owned was a VERY, VERY sweet bass. I somewhat regret parting with it almost every day. Everything about it was top notch. The single coil JJ that I had, I never warmed up to much at all. It played amazingly well, but the tone and and especially the B string performance was not for me.
I moved on from Sadowsky mostly because of the B string performance. I know that countless TBers will state that the Sadowsky B string is excellent, and perhaps among 34" scale bolt-ons it is, but having owned other basses such as Modulus, Roscoe and Lakland, I found myself wanting when playing the Sadowskys.
I play a lot of R&B and adult comtemp stuff and use the B string A LOT. I have very high demands and for me, the number one consideration for a 5 string bass is the B. I want it to be clean, clear and very well balanced with the other strings in terms of dynamics, tone and texture. Does a Sadowsky offer this? Yes, it does much better than MOST basses out there. But, are the others that do it better? Absolutely, IMO.
For my approach and goals, Sadowsky didn't cut it in terms of a B. Now, I am playing Dingwall basses. They have great tone, great feel, great build, etc. They are made as well as a Sadowsky and have the B string performance that I feel is superior for my tone preferences.
It's all about preference at the Sadowsky price point. Obviously, there's a TON of great things to say about them. My preferences simply led another way.
I would take exception to characterizing Sadowsky basses as "Fender clones." They are not. Having owned at least a dozens Fenders, I can unequivocally state that the feel and tone is very different than a Fender bass.
Another point that should be made about a Sadowsky is that is is unfair to judge them without playing them in live ensemble setting. Much of the mojo comes from how they sit in a multi-instrument mix. This part of the Sadowsky character is hard to appreciate playing them in a shop alone.