I think the only issue with Lakland is that they started having a budget line made overseas, so when people say "Lakland", more than half the time they mean "Skyline", and there is a huge difference between the two. Lakland USA basses were among the finest available when they hit the market, and they still are, in my opinion.
But, just the same, I play a 2000 Music Man that is at least as good as any of the US Laklands I've played, and its still a top quality instrument. I'm not one for fads. Nothing that has come out since my 2003 Warwick was made for me is any great innovation in tone or playability.
The only production basses that interest me right now other than Music Man are Sandberg's California TT (a take on the Fender Jazz Bass), and Warwick's Streamer CV (also a take on the Fender Jazz Bass). Obviously, a Lakland is very similar, and I'd happily play one, too, if I could get the particular mix of features I want from Lakland.
I have zero interest in anything like a Dingwall, which seem to be very faddish right now. Dingwall makes great stuff, I'm sure, but I don't need or want fanned frets.
But, just the same, I play a 2000 Music Man that is at least as good as any of the US Laklands I've played, and its still a top quality instrument. I'm not one for fads. Nothing that has come out since my 2003 Warwick was made for me is any great innovation in tone or playability.
The only production basses that interest me right now other than Music Man are Sandberg's California TT (a take on the Fender Jazz Bass), and Warwick's Streamer CV (also a take on the Fender Jazz Bass). Obviously, a Lakland is very similar, and I'd happily play one, too, if I could get the particular mix of features I want from Lakland.
I have zero interest in anything like a Dingwall, which seem to be very faddish right now. Dingwall makes great stuff, I'm sure, but I don't need or want fanned frets.