• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join free Log in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Headstock modification

C

CPike

May 28, 2005
344
10
Dallas, TX
#1
I'm toying with the idea of modifying a headstock to make it more compact and lighter. It's a Fender style scroll pattern, straight (not angled). I want to remove the G tuner from the end and place it on the lower side (3+1), then re-shape the end of the headstock (basically lopping off the rounded end of it). I also want to shave off about 1/4in of wood from both the top and bottom edges - effectively turning the traditional size into a much more compact peghead.

My question is this: assuming I'd be removing approx. 25-30% of the material, would the remaining wood be strong enough to hold the tension of the strings? Also, is the fact that it's straight and non-angled have any bearing on the structural integrity of the resulting smaller headstock?

.cdp
 
#2
making the headstock thinner would be a bad idea which could make it unstable. Lopping off wood from its end where there are no tuners is fine. You state your gonna move the G string tuner. Just make sure you leave enough wood thickness between top ends of tuner shaft holes and edges of headstock. And dont mess with headstocks thickness.
 
#3
Thanks! Oh, I wasn't going to alter the thickness at all - I just meant I want to remove wood from the edges. Right now, the holes are about 3/4in from the edge - lotsa wood there. I'm thinking it should be ok to trim the edge down so it's about 1/2in from the holes...

.cdp
 
#6
CPike said:
Thanks! Oh, I wasn't going to alter the thickness at all - I just meant I want to remove wood from the edges. Right now, the holes are about 3/4in from the edge - lotsa wood there. I'm thinking it should be ok to trim the edge down so it's about 1/2in from the holes...

.cdp
Click to expand...

Half inch or little more should be fine. As best I can tell, on my espltd f154 the holes themself are right at half inch distance from edge of headstock for closest to edge one.
 
#10
I've done this to several Fender type pegheads with good results. I've noticed the "dead spot" has either gone away or been reduced and neck dive is non-existant.

The large tuner holes in this one were plugged, the front and back veneered, front edges chamfered and new holes for Goto types drilled.

HMpeghead.jpg


Glad your mod went well.
mech

Edit: I do make sure the tuners are lined up for a straight pull on the strings.
 
#11
I'll try to get some pics of mine by the end of the week. It's really nothing special, though. I just wanted it to be simple, not flashy - but also not dorky, either. The original headstock was the standard Fender Precision shape (the bass is an early '70s Japanese P-bass knockoff by "Ventura"). I kept the original (Schaller) 11/16'' holes, which were the same needed for a cannibalized set of old Ibanez machines. The weight difference was significant because the Ibanez machine gears had a smaller compact footprint despite the full-size shafts.

@mech: Funny you should mention it, but the dead spot (typical 5th fret on G str "C") is completely gone now and the note sustains as much as any other! I used to use a Fat Finger to compensate for this but no more...

Again, pics later this week -
.cdp
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom
Back