• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Help me dispel the myths...

Myths? No. Those are Truths.

Short scales (anything less than 35" scales) are amateur basses and only for students with small hands. String tension is higher with longer scale lengths, and good string tension is necessary for any professional.

Neck-thru is simply a better-construction method and a more sound design. Bolt-on necks should be reserved for short-scales (aka student instruments). There's no use in making amateur basses with better quality. When the bassist is good enough, he should upgrade to a pro instrument.

5-strings are the old 4-strings, and 6-string are the new 5-strings. What that means is that 4-strings are obsolete and 5-strings are the new standard for students and amateur-grade instruments. Pro bassists should not, under any circumstance play fewer than 6-string basses.

Active electronics are ALWAYS better than passive electronics. Firstly, active electronics can cop that "vintage, passive feel" that some of the older generations prefer (even though they are no longer acceptable in today's music). Active electronics are a must for pro instruments (again, passive should be left for the not-so-professionals) because all situations a pro bassist will encounter require on-the-fly EQ changes to suit the house mix and overall band sound.


This may seem a bit rash, but there is way too much diversity among bassists these days, and conflicting views lead to arguments that have no justification and are based on "preference." By mandating some of these changes, the system is better conformed, but leaves ample room for personality (wood types, paint jobs, scale lengths above 35", number of strings above 6, hardware type and color, onboard preamps, pickups...etc). However, it also sets clear lines for amateurs and pros so that the unworthy amateurs with little musical ability can stop saturating the market and let true artists fill the roles they deserve.

Oh thank goodness someone's already said it.
I was auditioning bassists for a big band I was leading back in the 90's, and this guy shows up and pulls out a FOUR STRING.
I asked him if he thought this audition was a joke. He asked me what I was talking about so I pissed in his case for sassing me. He didn't get the job of course.
Some people can be so unprofessional. :rollno:
 
I have no idea how long my neck is. I just play the thing haha. I was just making a point. I will have to measure it.

I was just upset about the comments that were made unless they were a joke.

Playing it is what matters, for sure! I was just cracking a joke. :D

At first I was a little irritated too and had a reply ready, but then I figured I'd wait for confirmation as to whether it was a joke or not. Now I don't really care any more... If it's a joke, ha ha no worries. If it's not, no amount of arguing is going to change an opinion like that. ;)

I bet it's not long before this thread is locked. :ninja: lol

5sg.
 
lomo, being a gear slut is fine if you can afford it. we all have our own personal tone quests. but i just spent a week on a cruise ship playing a $325 bass into broken cabs and not one person complained about my sound except me.

Agreed 200%. BTW that says something great about your playing. Maybe I should play crappy stuff so I can blame my musical shortcomings on the gear........it'd be MUCH cheaper, LOL.
 
Not bass specific by any means, but this is my favorite myth:
Vintage gear is better than new gear solely due to the mystical qualities imparted by it's advance age (but only if it's entirely original).

Granted some vintage gear is light years better than current stuff, but some is just plain old (and often worn out/broken/a POS to begin with).

I had a '71 Tele bass (single coil) that had plenty of mojo and looke great, but played like a dump truck and cut through a mix as effectively as a warm stick of butter would cut through a steel door.
 
cut through a mix as effectively as a warm stick of butter would cut through a steel door.

The problem is you're not holding the stick of butter correctly. :p

Myth #169 - Most people on TB have a clue about the topic on which they're posting.

Myth #245 - Everyone on TB has a sense of humor.

Corollary to #245 - No one on TB takes themselves too seriously.
 
Heh, well now I know exactly what bass I need to be a pro. Of course it will have to be a Fodera ;)

All joking aside, there's top-notch pro players on every side of those "myths" playing active, passive, neck through, bolt on, 4 string, 6 string, 12 string, upright, downright, funk, latin jazz, and eastern european bluegrass punk rock fusion funk. For just about every single thing someone tells you defines what a pro player should play there's exceptions.
 
ok, maybe not an idiot. but i definitely have to give pause at their level of knowledge. sometimes, when you're at the beginning stages, you will be asked what equipment you have as sort of a weeding out process. and yes, if a player's only rig is a 25w practice amp and an old teisco bass, you can tell they're not prepared for gigging. but you can't tell if they're any good or not. might be the best thing you ever heard if you slap a mic on it. since getting to a level of being in-demand around here for the better gigs, not one person ever asked me what my gear is. they just assume i'll be fine. and vice versa. therefore i've shown up sometimes with the crappiest bass/amp i've ever owned ;)

so don't worry about it...whatever you've got, play and play proudly.
 
Agreed 200%. BTW that says something great about your playing. Maybe I should play crappy stuff so I can blame my musical shortcomings on the gear........it'd be MUCH cheaper, LOL.
i'm not being totally honest here, lomo, i must confess. there was always good pa and i brought my vt and british and ran thru the board ;)
 

Latest posts