• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Hi-mass bridge? Bahhh humbug!

Thanks saved me a wasting time modifying my lovely NOS H'way One with its old style bridge - love this bass for its funky sound and light weight: less than 3.5 kg (or around 7 1/2 lbs) compared to most Fenders which come in at over 9 lbs.
 
Personally I think the stock Fender bridge works well. If ever, the only tweaks it needs is to have groves on the base plate to guide the saddles as it moves longitudinally as you set intonation (no side-to-side movements) and stock threaded saddles to adjust string spacing.
 
After experimenting with a hi-mass bridge (I will not mention names), I am back to my trusty Fender Vintage with the threaded saddles.
Don't get no better than that!
:D
+1000!

Decades ago, Guitar Player magazine, before it split off to Bass Player magazine, did a feature on bass bridges, back when brass was in vogue, and everyone thought weight equaled sustain. They tried everything available at the time. Before HipShot was a glimmer, and the whole idea of "aftermarket" was just starting to bloom. (God, I'm old!)

Surprise, surprise: the bridge that least colored the tone of the instrument, and had the best sustain with conventional Fender-style instruments (meaning bolt on neck to a 2-piece body), was the vintage Fender with threaded saddles.

There is nothing new in the world but the history a person doesn't know.