• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Home Studio Help $1k Budget

conttador

Supporting Member
Jun 10, 2010
1,639
2,228
San Antonio, TX
I’d like to get some recording gear for home. I have no idea what to look for so I could use some help.

Im thinking perhaps an interface & monitors. I already have a Mac so just looking to start recording myself with play along tracks & musicians from time to time.

a friend of mine recommended the SSL 2+ for an interface but I’d be interested to hear what you guys would recommend on a $1k budget.

Thanks as always!
 
Any consumer tier interface that’s not the absolute bottom of the budget range will be fine. Focusrite, Presonus, Audient and the SSL unit you mentioned all have roughly the same quality level of preamps and converters. The SSL has a color circuit built in which might be useful if you like the color it provides. MOTU, RME and Apogee all offer slightly higher quality but not game changing. Grab whichever interface checks off all the boxes you need in terms of functionality and then grab a pair of Kali LP-6 or JBL LSR305 monitors and you’ll be all set.
 
My setup is in that price range and i love it. Tascam us-16x08 interface
Focal Alpha 50 monitors

Be sure to get monitors that will work in your particular room. Tiny room, don't get big speakers, big room, don't get small speakers...

Most pro-sumer gear these days can sound pretty good imo. You really can't go wrong as long as you get something you can return if you end up not liking it...
 
JBL 305P monitors are among the cheapest that perform well. They cost a little over $300 per pair new. Any money spent on sound treatment after that will be money well-spent. I think this would be preferable to spending more on monitors and less on sound treatment.

You're going to want a pair of decent headphones to sort out details in your mix. I use Sennheiser HD 560s, which are the more inexpensive consumer version of HD400s. They're identical in terms of sound. I spent $135 refurbished from Sennheiser. These are open-backed headphones that I find excellent for mixing. If you'll be tracking with a mic you need closed back headphones. I just use cheapo OneOdios from Amazon for that, and they double as bass-heavy reference phones. Audio Technica M50X ($150) Audio Technica M40X ($100), and Sony MDR 7506 ($100) are closed back headphones that should tolerable for both mixing and tracking.

Any decent interface will be good. I use the Focusrite 2i2 simply because I wanted to use what everyone else is using because I hate messing with software.

You'll need a mic and a stand. If you're not recording a ton of vocals and acoustic instruments, then just make sure you have a decent $100 dynamic mic like a Shure SM57/58 or a, SE V7, and a stand. If you are recording more vocals and acoustic guitars, etc., you probably want a condenser mic. I like my AT 2035, which cost about $135. There are plenty of very useable options in the $100 range.

Here's my budget:

Monitors: JBL 305P $330
Headphones: Audio Technica M40X or Sony MDR 7506 $100
Interface: Focusrite 2i2: $170
Mic: Shure SM57/58 (dynamic) or SE X1A (condenser) $100
DAW: Reaper $60.
Sound treatment: Whatever is left

Anything left over, I'd spend on sound treatment. Read up on it but don't be intimidated by what everyone says you need. It'll be more than you can possibly do initially. Just do what you can.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the responses! I have some homework! Has anyone used these monitors:

KRK ROKIT 5 G4 5 inch Powered Studio Monitor Pair

They were recommended by a friend but I don’t believe anyone has mentioned them.

Thanks again!

Rokit got a lot of bad reviews in the past for their budget monitors, but the G4 series seems to be very different. Would like to test them. At the Gearslutz forum, you find a lot of reviews including lots of comments from the guy, who developped their new line of speakers.
 
You don't need to spend a $1,000. Here is a list I would start with. If you really want to spend all $1,000 you can surely upgrade any of the following, but to begin with I don't see why. You will have to advance up the learning curve AND improve your space to notice any quality difference.

Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 170
PreSonus Eris E3.5-3.5" Near Field Studio Monitor (Pair) 100
Bluebird XLR Condenser Microphone 250
Aokeo Professional Studio Recording Microphone Isolation 80
AKG Pro Audio K92 Over-Ear, Closed-Back, Studio Headphones, 65
Cords and stuff 100
A real DAW 100

Total 865
 
Last edited:
As an Amazon Associate, TalkBass may receive commissions from qualifying purchases made via links on this site.
  • Like
Reactions: el jeffe bass
Thank you for the responses! I have some homework! Has anyone used these monitors:

KRK ROKIT 5 G4 5 inch Powered Studio Monitor Pair

They were recommended by a friend but I don’t believe anyone has mentioned them.

Thanks again!

I checked them out at the store when I was buying my JBLs, and I also heard them at a friend's house, although I'm not sure those were precisely the same model. I liked them a lot, and they were actually my first choice, but I found the JBLs were on sale for cheap because they were white. KRK has a reputation for having hyped bass, but I didn't get the sense that the low end was hyped. You could hear it really really well, though.

On a continuum between Yamaha HS5s, which are brash and detailed speakers that sound very much like studio monitors, with a ton of very clear, slightly annoying mids, and JBL 305Ps, which are clear and unhyped, but sound more like regular speakers, the KRKs are kind of in the middle. They're much easier to listen to than the Yamahas but have that presence that makes them sound like studio monitors. I liked them a lot.

I like the JBLs too, and I haven't had trouble hearing things, but I bet the KRKs serve up the bass and kick drum on a silver platter, at least to the extent that their size allows.
 
I have the Tascam US16x08 interface and very pleased with it, there is an upgraded version out now and I think you get a lot of bang for your buck. 8 XLR, 2 Line/Inst, and 6 Line only channels. I have inserts from my mixer going into the 6 direct line in channels and makes it easy to record a practice. Having the extra channels I find very convenient.
For microphones, I have a mix of stage mics Shure SM58, SM57 clones (mic'ing amps), Sennheiser e825, for vocals I really like the SE X1A condenser mic - sounds great at $100 price point.

In my "studio" for monitors I just listen to rough mixes through the PA (or headphones). I usually mix in my home office where I have a set of PreSonus e3.5 monitors which sound pretty good in this small room. In hindsight I would have gone larger for better bass definition, but these little guys sound pretty good.

I caveat that with I'm a novice at recording and engineering. I don't think you need to break the bank to get started and you can always upgrade down the road.

Good luck on your project...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: el jeffe bass
Thank you for all of your input. Why did you guys pick the interfaces that you did? I’ll check out the monitors. Is there some sort of ratio to determine the best size for monitors?

Thanks again friends!
i picked the Tascam 16x08 because it has 8 mic preamps and 8 line inputs. nothing else in its price range (at the time) had 16 simultaneous inputs. i used to record bands in the before-times and actually used all 16.

what are the dimensions of your room? unless it's quite large (like over 300 sq feet maybe?), monitors with a 5 or 6 inch woofer should do fine.

this might be good info for you to digest: Studio Monitor Placement: Positioning Tips for Optimal Sound
 
Last edited:
I have major issues with the guidance in this document. The biggest one is that they advise placing monitors on the longest wall thus firing them into the shortest room dimension. This is contrary to every studio designer I've spoken to as well as the folks at GIK where I purchased all of the acoustic treatments for my studio build. Universally the guidance was to place monitors on the shortest wall thus firing into the longest room dimension.

Perhaps just as bad they give poor advice on monitor placement relative to the front wall. They advise placing the monitors 1-2' out from the wall and cite soffit-mounted monitors in pro studios as the better way to do. They're correct that soffit-mounting is out of the reach of virtually all home studios, but placement of monitors 1-2' out from the wall is not a good solution. This calculator indicates why these types of placements are less ideal: The Wall Behind The Loudspeaker (mh-audio.nl). For the best results with free-standing monitor speakers (i.e. speakers not meant to be soffit-mounted) there are two ideal positions: Either far enough away from the front wall to move quarter and half wavelength cancellation frequencies low enough that they become inaudible (i.e. greater than about 7' which is not plausible in most home studio settings), or as close to the front wall as possible without touching to move the quarter and half wavelength cancellations high enough that they're easily dealt with using readily available acoustic treatments.

Less egregiously they indicate to place the monitors such that your head is at the convergence of an equilateral triangle. This is commonly quoted but typically the better advice is to place your head such that the convergence point occurs between 12" and 14" behind your head.

They talk about placing your monitors at a point that's not halfway between the floor and the ceiling. Not bad advice, but a better starting point is to align the monitor's high frequency driver with your ear's tragus when in the mix position.

They also talk about room modes, which is excellent information, but only truly useful if you're building a room. Once the room is built the modes are what they are and there's nothing you can do about that. You can add acoustic treatments to modify the decay characteristics of certain frequencies, but the time to really care about modes is during the design phase before you've physically constructed the room your studio will occupy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: And I