• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Hot-Rodded Cheapo (GSR205 content...)

I have the same bass. Best mod was to rip out the Phat 2 replaced by el cheapo Chinese 3 band. Have a set of Gotoh tuners still to be fitted as the OE ones are junk. BUT WANT ONE OF THOSE BRIDGES
Heard a lot about the Phat 2, mainly how great it is once you yank it out! Maybe it’s because mine is older, but there’s no pre. It’s 100% passive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gt6s
I hot rod’d a 4 string GSR 200 P/J several years back. Installed a set of active EMG P/J’s wired vol/vol/tone (no pre), a Gotoh bridge and tuners, and a graphite nut. It was light and sounded huge, and it was totally silent, no hiss or buzz even in recording situations thanks to the EMGs.

Kinda want to do it again, esp after seeing yours.
 
how could you have changed it from 15mm to 17mm spacing on that neck with that much space outside the G and B strings still? I can't imagine that you added an entire 8mm, nearly a centimeter, roughly a third of an inch, to the overall string width, and have it still fit so similarly looking on the neck.

If that's true then the "before" pic must be misleading somehow because I sure don't see much difference in the outer string-to-fretboard-edge between before and after.

ALL THAT BEING SAID, This is a totally awesome thing you're doing, I LOVE the bridge, LOVE The pickguard, LOVE the preamp addon/upgrade.

So good to see!

Personally I am totally enjoying my cheapo ibanez bass, it's my main bass now besides my carvin fretless. I love my fully stock crappy old sr300 with proper setup (Which I think is nearly never done, specially regarding the pickup angles/heights and choice of strings for the bass).

If I ever did an upgrade it would probably be new pots because the current ones are pretty scratchy, but I also don't have any de-oxit so maybe if I did they could be cleaned up.

That's about it though.

insane basses... WAY WAY WAY better than they should be. I like it so much I've been selling off my much heavier, less comfortable, much higher quality big name basses. I'm not kidding.

the bridge and so on with my bass is actually pretty good. sustain is good, intonation is perfect (after I set it up), action is quite low although a spec buzzy (the frets are not super well finished or even, I'll say that about the cheapness), and it sounds so good you'd all be pretty shocked compared to other sr-300 basses of any year, I bet ya.

If price was no object, I might just do some upgrades like you're doing... possibly even change it from 4 to 5 strings.... not sure it could hold up though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oig
Ya know, now that I think about it I may have confused these measurements with the ones I took of my Carvin 6 string’s bridge. Either way, the new bridge is wider than the original and feels better.

Nothing wrong with the SR300, I was seriously looking at one earlier this year. Took me a while getting used to this, but once I got over the cheapness I began to see its potential. I guess we’ll see when it’s all said and done, right?

Glad you like the mods, I’m pretty stoked about them myself!
 
Yes - I had the same thought as dkelley - where did all the space come from ? The strings SHOULD be hanging over the edge of the fingerboard if you widened the spacing so much.

Maybe you are measuring from the inside edges of the strings instead of the string centers?? Anyway - this is great and I am going to get one of those bridges in anticipation of getting another Ibby x05.
 
People also measure wrong and don't know how to do it. You can see by the pics yours had the 16.5mm
See two posts above. In my case it wasn’t incorrect measurement but a brain fart. I’m not sure which is more embarrassing....In any case, you’re indeed right - I think it had 16.5 mm spacing originally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beej
9C38D57A-2C58-465E-8808-D30ECD7FDF81.jpeg


Old and new. Even just visually the difference in quality is night and day. The machining on the Yamahas is just so much cleaner.

986B31C0-2994-40D9-9929-7070817C91CF.jpeg


They feel great too! Much better. It can pretend to be a good bass now, lol
 
Last edited:
Funny, I always like to see something on the headstock. I add logos on my own builds for that reason. I didn't get rid of the Gio to mask it (anyone familiar with Ibanez basses should still know exactly what it is) - it was just too cluttered. At least, that's my rationale and I'm sticking with it hahaha!
 
Heard a lot about the Phat 2, mainly how great it is once you yank it out! Maybe it’s because mine is older, but there’s no pre. It’s 100% passive.
I bought mine on ebay cheap enough coz I wanted an active fiver. Not quite so cheap now with £40 Flatwounds £60 on Gotoh tuners and £10 on preamp. More than bass cost., Have to say now pretty decent, once I change the tuners (tho they do work and keep tune JUST JUNK)
 
Last edited: