• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

How The Beatles Recorded Bass in 1967

I hope it's OK to post this here. I came across it by accident and being a Beatles fan from the sixties I found it quite interesting. There are more of them too, which I plan to investigate.

p.s.
Sorry if it's been posted before, it was new to me.



I'd take the amp info portion of that, maybe more, with not only a grain of salt, but perhaps the whole shaker. He does a great disservice by using a silverface Showman/2x15 cab as an example, when all historical records show that Paul employed a blond Bassman/2x12 rig(among other amps). You may think that a Fender is a Fender is a Fender, but it's an entirely different sound. Come early '69, when they shifted over entirely to silverface, Paul used an upright cab Bassman set-up, still featuring dual 12's. They just didn't need 'loud' amps anymore, and in late '66 to early '67, Vox was still their go-to brand(along with a random Fender or Selmer guitar combo). Right at that point in time, they all utilized the short-lived Vox UL hybrid line...transistor pre, tube/valve power. The guitar sounds on that album are certainly unique...sharp, almost shrill. Even with the Vox, Paul employed a 2x12 cab.
If you want to do serious research, beyond Geoff Emerick's book, you'd be better off checking into the unquestionable scholarship of Mark Lewisohn, Jim Elyea, and Andy Babiuk. I'm aquainted with Elyea, I've seen his amp collection(he owns a prop house and supplies period correct music gear to film studios), but his massive volume on Vox amps is a bit hard to come by, and pricey. There's yet another huge, rare, expensive, but intensely detailed book on everything technical that the Beatles encountered, but the name of it escapes me right now.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: marchone
Great subject matter. I'm just seeing the tip of the iceberg with what Geoff Emerick did at Abbey Road.

I stumbled across this nugget when looking for info on Paperback Writer. How do you use a speaker as a microphone?

'Paperback Writer' was the first time the bass sound had been heard in all its excitement. For a start, Paul played a different bass, a Rickenbacker. Then we boosted it further by using a loudspeaker as a microphone. We positioned it directly in front of the bass speaker and the moving diaphragm of the second speaker made the electrical current.

Geoff Emerick
The Complete Beatles Recording Sessions, Mark Lewisohn
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Slinger
I stumbled across this nugget when looking for info on Paperback Writer. How do you use a speaker as a microphone?

'Paperback Writer' was the first time the bass sound had been heard in all its excitement. For a start, Paul played a different bass, a Rickenbacker. Then we boosted it further by using a loudspeaker as a microphone. We positioned it directly in front of the bass speaker and the moving diaphragm of the second speaker made the electrical current.

My favorite bit of arcane trivia about that episode: Apparently Abbey Road Studios was such a stickler for proper [sic] engineering protocol that the staff engineer who assisted Emerick on ^^^that session was reprimanded for "improper impedance matching"!!!
 
Unless I'm mistaken, DI ("direct injection") was invented at a Beatles session, and I believe it was for Paul's bass.
There's seemingly no end to the innovations connected with those guys. It's mind boggling.
I'll see your Apple D.I. and raise you the Motown Wolfbox D.I used by James Jameson.
The reverse speaker is a clever idea though. I'd like to try that out sometime.
Wolfbox - Wikipedia
 
  • Like
Reactions: marchone
"Wednesday 1 February, 1967. Studio Two: 7:00pm-2:30am. Recording: 'Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band' (takes 1-9) ... Paul's bass was recorded by direct injection of the sound into the recording console, as opposed to being recorded through an amplifier and a microphone. 'I think direct injection was probably used on Beatles sessions for the first time anywhere in the world,' says Ken Townsend. 'We built our own transformer boxes [called DIT boxes] and plugged the guitars straight into the equipment.' Direct injection, or DI for short, greatly attracted John Lennon, forever keen on short cuts, especially if there was a chance that his vocals might somehow be changed in the process. Stories are legion at Abbey Road of John doing anything to change his voice -- a most curious fixation considering that his singing was the envy of all others and is quite properly regarded as being among the best in all rock music. 'John came up to the control room one day and asked if we could possibly inject his voice directly into the console,' says Geoff Emerick. 'George [Martin] replied, 'Yes, if you go and have an operation. It means sticking a jackplug into your neck!'"
The Beatles Recording Sessions / Mark Lewisohn
New York : Harmony Books, 1988. p. 95
 

Latest posts