Between the 905 and 505 I chose the first one, because of two reasons: The B-string is a lil' bit more tense because of the bridge (strings-through-body) and the neck-through on the 905 and also it simply felt more comfortable (the curved body which you see on lot of Warwicks is really nice for longer gigs/rehearsals).nonohmic said:Funnily enough, im looking at the same two basses. But i was also thinking of the sr505.
How does it compare to the 905?
I've always felt like the 505 is just a wooden board with strings on it but many people have disagreed with me. The 905 however feels pretty much like the former Ergodyne-basses which were some of the most comfy basses on the market.
Also, as TheInsane mentioned: Good balance is something very important on a bass if you're looking for something comfortable, and most of the weight in the 505 lies in the neck, and not the body. (Just like Ibanez "prestige" series)
I totally disagree. If you have a bad sounding B-string; what's the point of playing a 5-stringer?ehque said:i think what's important is how the EADG strings feel and sound rather than the B. seriously, you'll be playing a lot more on the 4 than plonking the open B, so it shouldnt be that high on a piority list (and sometimes a floppy B may be due to dead/bad stock strings).
45-128's