• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

How to NOT find the new member you're looking for.

How many rehearsals do you honestly think it takes to get a bar band ready for a gig on average?

  • 3 or less

    Votes: 160 28.8%
  • 4 to 6

    Votes: 181 32.6%
  • 7 to 10

    Votes: 95 17.1%
  • Between 10 and 20

    Votes: 55 9.9%
  • Several months of rehearsals at least twice a week

    Votes: 29 5.2%
  • Just move into the rehearsal spot and bring your own carrots.

    Votes: 36 6.5%

  • Total voters
    556
So Anyway, my first band practiced three times a week, every week, with no gig on the books. We played out a handful of times in a couple of years. I did it because I was learning how to play my instrument. Maybe we were 'card night with guitars' as in the OP.

Ten years later, one of my music buddies calls. He's talked his way into a house gig and he needs a band. A few phone calls, one rehearsal, and we play three times a week for a year. We'd learn a few new songs a week and put them together on stage. Some worked, some didn't, but it sure helped to develop our ears and keep us on our toes.

If it takes more that a couple of rehearsals to put a bar band together, you might be trying to play stuff that's not bar music. Or maybe the band members just don't have enough experience or common musical interests. Either way, I'd be very wary...unless you just enjoy the 'card game'.
 
Depending on the complexity of songs, how many on the setlist and how competent the other players are rehearsing twice a week consistently, I'd say 4-6wks give or take, to play the songs tightly. And by rehearsing, i mean learning the sht at home and bringing it to rehearsal....Not hanging and noodling around at an hourly space for 4 hrs.
 
Provided with a copy of the setlist and links to the format of the version covered, being i dont sing i can show up and get it right. I think the majority of the effort is for the vocalists, as thats not always as clean cut.(at least imho). Now...the music I play most of the time includes possibly song base of a couple of hundred tunes and the original band (the Grateful Dead) has variations of each song over the years , not always the same format (but close enough, with a quick discussion can be clarified) . I can still show up cold and do a great show subbing with a new band in front of a 1000 people without a hitch or any stress. I guess point being if you know the music prior or learning new music requires different effort.
 
OK, I have a band. I won't commit to another one. But I do enjoy fill in gigs. They challenge me, broaden my network, and are basically fun and interesting. As such, I glance at local CL ads from time to time, sometimes offering my services to bands looking for new members. ("I can't join another band. But if you have a couple of dates you need to play let me know. I may be a good fit to fill in." ... kind of thing.)

Doing so today I noticed a trend.

Lots of bands have ads up looking for a new singer, or bass player, or guitarist, etc. Many seem to have one thing in common. "You must be able to commit to rehearsals once or twice a week." Most of these bands aren't established. They don't have gigs on the books. They "plan to start playing out" "this fall", or "have connections at local venues" and "hope to be gigging soon".

Really? So, you want me to have great gear, have reliable transportation, have talent, AND be ready to rehearse once or twice a week, possibly in a neighboring town (meaning a twenty or thirty minute drive each way), for weeks and months for a band with no gigs?????

Guys, let's get real.

1) Most people just don't have that kind of time to commit. You're weeding out most of your potential new band members/applicants/auditions. There could be a perfect fit for your band reading your ad who could be ready in half a dozen rehearsals or less, but won't reply because all they see is an ad for a LOOOOOONG commitment and no guaranteed outcome.

2) If you NEED that kind of time to bring a show together, (sorry to say it but) you guys just can't play. Again, I'm sorry. But it's true. If you have to do a few dozen rehearsals to get ready to play at a bar, you're not ready to play in public period. Or you have chosen music that is beyond your scope.

Now, this is an entirely different category from those bands that just want "some people to jam with" once a week. Those people have stated the intended goal. Those people are looking for a weekly "card night" only with guitars and whatnot. If that is the stated, intended, goal, by all means, have your band the way you want it.

But if you have plainly stated that this band is NOT just for fun, rather to be a working, gigging band, one or two rehearsals per week for up to several months is utterly ridiculous. It is, quite simply, too much of a gamble to ask of someone.

Try this. Get organized. Make a setlist. Place an ad for the kind of musician you are looking for (talent, gear, the kinds of shows you either already play or want to, travel, frequency, look, vocals or not, etc.). Do NOT.... I repeat, DO NOT go off on some silly diatribe about commitment. It's asinine. Hammer that out later. If you get a response, send out the setlist. Inquire as to how long the person thinks it would take for him/her to get that setlist "gig ready". Go from there. Set up an audition to see if that person is a good fit.

If so, proceed as follows.

Split the list into thirds or fourths. Set up a rehearsal for each section. Then do another one to iron out any notes made during previous rehearsals. If absolutely unavoidable, do one more to run everything. Boom. Go get gigs.

Let the time commitment be done AT HOME. I can sit down for a little while each night, or after brunch on Saturday, or whenever, to get MY HOMEWORK done. We don't need to be in the same room TWENTY TIMES to be gig ready. Nobody needs to load up gear, drive anywhere from a few miles to another town over, load in, rehearse the same songs over and over again, load out, drive home, load in at home, take a few days off, rinse and repeat until Christmas. That's just dumb.

I've brought this up in previous threads. But it was so prevalent just now I thought it deserved its own thread.

As for the poll, I get it that "it depends". But what's your gut on this if we're not talking about a Yes or Rush tribute band.

I went with 7 to 10 after just going through this with a new (to me) group, plus a new keyboard player and new backup singer. We were hustling to be ready for our first job together after maybe five rehearsals, weren’t really polished and…got rained out. Outdoor gig at a marina.

Best thing that could have happened. We crammed in a few more, played a local craft brewery and just booked our third gig there (both times we played this month they booked us again immediately). The extra couple of rehearsals took us from “we’ll be ok” to burning the place down. It’s fun to hustle up and get “good enough” to go through the material, but it really does pay to put in a couple of extra cycles if you can afford it.
 
Interesting thread. I just auditioned with some folks that were in a previous band, and they gigged regularly in the past, mostly country covers with a couple originals thrown in. Anywhere from 1 to 3 sets.

This new project is with the singer they gigged with before, but he is now signed and our focus is to get out and gig, primarily to promote his songs.

Country is a new genre for me (rock and roll!). These guys are really good, tight, and the guitar player has an endorsement from a guitar manufacturer and gigs regularly without practice or rehearsals. So I am under tremendous pressure to learn a set, along with the originals. We need get get out and play ASAP in an attempt to get the originals out there and support the A&R guy to get airplay.

With that said, I expect no more than a couple more practices, one rehearsal to start gigging. I have been playing way more years than I care to admit - but haven’t gigged in years.

So a little different than what this thread is about, but just my 2 pesos.
 
late to the party here, but really love your OP. should be a sticky or something.

my biggest thing I notice about CL ads recently in my area is the total cluelessness about band monogamy.
it's actually not a good idea to refuse to hire people who happen to be in several other bands.
If you find someone that claims to be great, but they are not in other bands, it's because they 1) just got out of prison, or 2) suck, or 3) both
And people wonder why it's so hard to find a good ....insert instrument here.....
it drives me insane.
end of rant
 
If your bandmates need that much massaging, maybe you're in the wrong band.
It all depends. I have joined bands that were already gigging. I just showed up and played. Simple.
I have also joined bands that were just starting. I had to count every measure and commit everything to memory. Then I would have to be like a rock and make them follow me. After many many rehearsals they would finally get it. Yes we had gigs lined up and we were ready when the time came.
You have to be able to play with all levels of players sometimes to be able to keep gigging. Or you wait for those absolute pros to need you specifically. There’s a lot of competition out there.
 
OK, I have a band. I won't commit to another one. But I do enjoy fill in gigs. They challenge me, broaden my network, and are basically fun and interesting. As such, I glance at local CL ads from time to time, sometimes offering my services to bands looking for new members. ("I can't join another band. But if you have a couple of dates you need to play let me know. I may be a good fit to fill in." ... kind of thing.)

Doing so today I noticed a trend.

Lots of bands have ads up looking for a new singer, or bass player, or guitarist, etc. Many seem to have one thing in common. "You must be able to commit to rehearsals once or twice a week." Most of these bands aren't established. They don't have gigs on the books. They "plan to start playing out" "this fall", or "have connections at local venues" and "hope to be gigging soon".

Really? So, you want me to have great gear, have reliable transportation, have talent, AND be ready to rehearse once or twice a week, possibly in a neighboring town (meaning a twenty or thirty minute drive each way), for weeks and months for a band with no gigs?????

Guys, let's get real.

1) Most people just don't have that kind of time to commit. You're weeding out most of your potential new band members/applicants/auditions. There could be a perfect fit for your band reading your ad who could be ready in half a dozen rehearsals or less, but won't reply because all they see is an ad for a LOOOOOONG commitment and no guaranteed outcome.

2) If you NEED that kind of time to bring a show together, (sorry to say it but) you guys just can't play. Again, I'm sorry. But it's true. If you have to do a few dozen rehearsals to get ready to play at a bar, you're not ready to play in public period. Or you have chosen music that is beyond your scope.

Now, this is an entirely different category from those bands that just want "some people to jam with" once a week. Those people have stated the intended goal. Those people are looking for a weekly "card night" only with guitars and whatnot. If that is the stated, intended, goal, by all means, have your band the way you want it.

But if you have plainly stated that this band is NOT just for fun, rather to be a working, gigging band, one or two rehearsals per week for up to several months is utterly ridiculous. It is, quite simply, too much of a gamble to ask of someone.

Try this. Get organized. Make a setlist. Place an ad for the kind of musician you are looking for (talent, gear, the kinds of shows you either already play or want to, travel, frequency, look, vocals or not, etc.). Do NOT.... I repeat, DO NOT go off on some silly diatribe about commitment. It's asinine. Hammer that out later. If you get a response, send out the setlist. Inquire as to how long the person thinks it would take for him/her to get that setlist "gig ready". Go from there. Set up an audition to see if that person is a good fit.

If so, proceed as follows.

Split the list into thirds or fourths. Set up a rehearsal for each section. Then do another one to iron out any notes made during previous rehearsals. If absolutely unavoidable, do one more to run everything. Boom. Go get gigs.

Let the time commitment be done AT HOME. I can sit down for a little while each night, or after brunch on Saturday, or whenever, to get MY HOMEWORK done. We don't need to be in the same room TWENTY TIMES to be gig ready. Nobody needs to load up gear, drive anywhere from a few miles to another town over, load in, rehearse the same songs over and over again, load out, drive home, load in at home, take a few days off, rinse and repeat until Christmas. That's just dumb.

I've brought this up in previous threads. But it was so prevalent just now I thought it deserved its own thread.

As for the poll, I get it that "it depends". But what's your gut on this if we're not talking about a Yes or Rush tribute band.
I disagree with pretty much everything you said, unless you're talking about the cargo-shorts-wearing, Mustang-Sally-playing, dad band. We have a million of those around here and not a one of them is worth hearing.

On the the flipside, are bands like I'm coming out of, the one I'm putting together, and a couple of others around here that are worth the cover charge. These are 8 to 9 piece bands, with difficult material that very often needs to be worked out in person, not just using an mp3 player.

Of course, players are always expected to arrive at rehearsal prepared, but try doing an earth wind and fire or tower of power song as you suggest; it ain't gonna happen.

And bands that attempt more difficult material require more time and a definite commitment from the players.

One of the worst things I deal with is the herding cats nature of managing a large group of in-demand players. There's always a scheduling issue, so getting it out front that you want a commitment is a good thing.

Bar bands doing pop covers are fine for what you outline, but anything actually worth hearing requires a hell of a lot more effort.
 
Last edited:
Assuming people that do the minimum of running through some songs before practices, you should be able to take non professionals from meet up for the first time to gig ready in 3 rehearsals. Most of that will be ironing out "I learned it from the original pressing", "I learned it from the radio edit" or stupid little things like that. Figuring out who is starting which song, what ending you're doing, especially on songs that fade on the recording. Oh, it's Eb standard on the recording, we always played it in E standard.

EDIT: I forgot the required ~ 15 minutes of discussion whether this IPA is better than that IPA.
 
I disagree with pretty much everything you said, unless you're talking about the cargo-shorts-wearing, Mustang-Sally-playing, dad band. We have a million of those around here and not a one of them is worth hearing.

On the he flipside, are bands like I'm coming out of, the one I'm putting together, and a couple of others around here that are worth the cover charge. These are 8 to 9 piece bands, with difficult material that very often needs to be worked out in person, not just using an mp3 player.

Of course, players are always expected to arrive at rehearsal prepared, but try doing an earth wind and fire or tower of power song as you suggest it ain't gonna happen.

And bands that attempt more difficult material require more time and a definite commitment from the players.

One of the worst things I deal with is the herding cats nature of managing a large group of in demand players. There's always a scheduling issue, so getting it out front that you want a commitment is a good thing.

Bar bands doing pop covers are fine for what you outline, but anything actually worth hearing requires a hell of a lot more effort.

1) I love both EWF and Tower or Power. I've seen both in concert several times. But your assertion that they are the "only thing worth hearing" is asinine.

2) I stand by original post. If you need lots of rehearsals to bring the music around, you have chosen music that is beyond your scope/talent level collectively. My corporate band was a horn band. We did the kinds of songs you are talking about. We ran them at soundtrack and played them that night. It is what it is. :cool:
 
Pros can show up and play, if you've got a book.

Hobbyists developing an act need time to figure out ALL the things.

If you're a pro looking for sub work, skip the "must commit to 2x a week rehearsals without any dates on the book" ads.

Seems pretty simple to me.

I do skip those ads. This wasn't about any kind of band I would be interested in to begin with. It was about tue frequency with which I see those kinds of ads.
 
I do skip those ads. This wasn't about any kind of band I would be interested in to begin with. It was about tue frequency with which I see those kinds of ads.
It sounds like what you are saying is there’s a ton of bands beneath your level looking for bass players.
This-is in your geographic area. Not like that in mine. I would love to see some ads needing bass players near me but it’s very slim pickings.
I will say this, there’s been zero CL ads near me with ready to gig bands needing a fill in bassist. If there was, I would be all over it. The closer you get to a startup band. The more rehearsals you will need regardless of talent. Of course if everyone in the band likes the same 50 songs then 2 or 3 rehearsals should do it.
 
Last edited:
But your assertion that they are the "only thing worth hearing" is asinine.

I didn't say that. I was referring to more complicated music. The same could be true for yes or rush or beethoven or anything complicated. It's not limited to just the bands I mention.

you need lots of rehearsals to bring the music around, you have chosen music that is beyond your scope/talent level collectively.

Bullsh!t. But my question is, how long was that band together? Bands that have played together for a long time can bust out things very quickly. I've been there. However, when putting something together out of the air, it takes longer.

Reading music helps greatly, but most don't.