Nice job,
swingin. You and others may wish to look
here. Long before you joined Talkbass, folks around here were treated to my mantra,
"Think SPL, not watts!". The link will lead you to my dissertations and explanations. Ah, if people would only use the search function...
It's also important to keep in mind that the amount of sound-pressure achieved for a given input is very much a function of the characteristics of the driver
and the cabinet.
With regard to clipping, the issue really isn't usually so much that the voltage remains constant for short periods. Clipping the amplifier is especially dangerous for tweeters. Taking your own example, when you clip a sign wave, you splatter the energy to higher frequencies. So, when an amplifier goes into hard clipping, there is a dramatic increase in the power that ends up at the input to the tweeter. Before you get much of a chance to hear a problem, the voice coil will be fried. As we agree, not so much with low-frequency drivers that will serve warning.
Thanks to
fdeck for the link. From looking at the picture of the cab with the back open, I'm quite confident that the driver will not handle much power at all. I base that on the size of the magnet and the nature of the cone and basket construction. I doubt that the cab/driver combination is very sensitive, especially where low frequencies are concerned, given the driver and that the cab looks to be an "infinite baffle" enclosure. Based on that picture, I'd say the OP should forget about using that cab.
BTW, an often overlooked factor is the
excursion of the driver which, in turn, affects its dynamic range. One can have a very sensitive driver/cab system that, for example, can achieve 97 dB SPL @ 1 watt measured 1 meter from the driver on-axis. It's important to know at what frequency that specification is measured. Here's why. All other things being equal, for a constant input voltage, the distance the driver cone travels increases as the
inverse square of frequency. This means that as you lower the frequency of the input, you will be causing to the cone to move over very rapidly increasing distances. While the driver may be able to achieve the specification at, say, 500 Hz, it may not be able to at 35 Hz. Now consider that as you increase the input voltage, you will again, be causing the driver to move over larger distances. Somewhere the limit will be reached.
What does all this mean? Simply put, one could have two speaker systems with identical sensitivity ratings. They could even have the same power handling ratings if the manufacturer chooses, say, 1000 Hz as the frequency at which to measure (many actually do!). Despite their seeming similarity, under real-world use, where the input voltage may rise for brief periods at low frequencies (transients), one cone may go "SPLATTTT" while the one designed with a greater excursion limit breezes right along.
=== Begin geekazoid section ===
Here, again, the design of the cabinet comes into play. It's possible to produce quite large (room- and house-shaking) sound-pressure levels at very low frequencies while the driver cone moves only a fraction of an inch. All you have to do is load the driver into a bass "horn." This makes the woofer cone function as a compression driver (like the drivers you typically see on the back of large mid-range and high-frequency horns of PA systems). The problem is that you need a HUGE cabinet (and sometimes the corner of walls to form the mouth of the horn). Google "Klipschorn" There are other ways to achieve this as well but, again, they require cabinets bigger than we're willing to haul around to gigs.
=== End geekazoid section ===
Finally, a word about "headroom." Headroom does not refer to having more watts than can be taken advantage of by your cabinets. Rather, headroom refers to the amount by which an amplifier can exceed its continuous wattage rating during short bursts. See
here for a more complete explanation.