• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

How wrong is this guy?

My own uneducated, subjective experience with ancient cabs is that some of them do get very loud with a smaller wattage amp, but they don't have the low, low end a good modern cab can deliver. I think that's in line with BFM's "200HZ" post.

Some time ago I read that Bag End D12-E cabinets actually worked well with this amp, if one EQ'd the amp with the cab's inherent voicing in mind. I could only find 2 locally that were affordable, so I used a Carvin 10.2 NEO becasue the price and size were right. Without the Carvin, the D12s have no highs, and very strong boom. The Carvin seems a mite mid shy (maybe just "flatter?") but has nice highs and tight low end. They work well together, and the whole thing breaks down to fit in a small car.

Currently I use just the Carvin , sufficient for group practice or smaller rooms. Sounds fine on its own, but I prefer the D12 augmenting it. If I had to choose just one type if cab, X3, I'd pick the Carvin (or the 4X10 version) but I like the way my current stack sounds.

If I had the $$ and the space for it, I'd contact Monolith and have 3 4X15s built.