I am talking about both, and they are indeed different. That was my point.
The comb filter response is determined by the frequency of the open string and the proportional position of the pickup aperture beneath that string. So for a 55 Hz open string pitch, and 1/4 length pickup position, the comb filter will have notches at 220, 440, 660, etc.
These comb filter frequencies do not change with the note played (fretted). If a harmonic node of any note just happens to lie above the pickup, then the frequency of that harmonic will be rejected.
The harmonic nodes of various fretted notes slide up and down along the length of the string along with the fretted position, and so slide over the pickup aperture. Therefore, different notes will have different harmonics rejected. But the frequencies of those rejected will be those of the comb filter notches.
-
I just mean that the terms node and antinode are correctly applied to the description of a standing waves. Standing waves or strings are not comb filters. A standing wave is created by a wave and its reflection which sets up a situation to create a comb filter, but it is not a comb filter. The nodes and antinodes get created by resonance. There are accentuated amplitude peaks and unmoving nodes, but no notches and no filters. Other waves can exist, but resonant frequencies have much greater amplitude because of resonance.
A comb filter needs a point of reference to listen from. The location of the pickup creates a comb filter with the two waves bouncing back and forth. The pickup only senses a sliver of the standing wave which is built of multiple overlapped frequencies. Some of those frequencies are not the harmonics even. Some of those frequencies will be cancelled at that location. Some of the frequencies will be amplified. This creates the pattern of notched frequencies that gives a comb filter its name.
The reason you ended up with a cancellation of the 4th harmonic in your scenario is because of the pickup location. I think the way you described it makes it sound like the notches are always at 220, 440, etc for a 55 hz string. However, that only works like this for that one pickup location.
In your post I commented on, you just were not referencing the pickup location and you made it seem like the notch frequencies would be at nodes always. If you set the pickup under a node, that will be the notch frequency. But the notch frequencies are not necessarily at a node at all. In fairness, I did think you explained it well, but it seemed too much like the notches would be the same as the nodes always.
On a 34" scale, you could set the pickup at 6" for a string with a fundamental frequency of 55 hz (the same string above, just with a different pickup location). That gives notches at 311, 622, etc. That is in between harmonics.
My point was that people were over using comb filter and notch frequency when what they were describing was a standing wave and an antinode. The two are definitely related, but not synonymous.
We are saying the same thing and in agreement with what is happening. I didn't even describe all that for your understanding. I think you have an excellent grasp of the topic. I wanted to try to clarify what is happening for other readers that don't understand and might confuse the two topics as the same.
You might like this page. It lets you see what happens when you change parameters on a guitar or bass.
Guitar Pickup Response Demonstration
Disclaimer: my last physics class was a decade ago.