I mean, this is by far the best option imo:
Completely green, looks pretty cool too, much nicer than a Prius.
Completely green, looks pretty cool too, much nicer than a Prius.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I'm an electrical engineer and I agree that hydrogen cars are the future.
We could have nuclear plants generate hydrogen at night when demand
for their output is low. This is the direction to true energy independence
and jobs at home.
Instead of the $800B spendulus program that did pretty much nothing,
they should have invested it in 100 new nuclear plants with the intent
of supporting hydrogen production for new vehicles.
A sketch for promoting the growth of the hydrogen producing infrastructure needed to make fuel cell-powered vehicles greener and more profitable:
1) Grey tech taxes go up
2) Green tech taxes go down
3) Standardize solar panel designs (look what IBM's 1981 PC spec. did for encouraging third party participation in making computers cheaper/faster) allowing for lower cost upgrades over time
4) Car makers get into the solar panel leasing business
5) Car makers lease solar panels to businesses, and home owners (who spend much of their time at work instead of at home using electricity)
6) The resulting surplus electricity (owned by the car makers/solar panel leasing companies), augmented as needed by that generated from wind turbines & nuclear (night/seasonal), is converted to hydrogen fuel *at the pumps and sold to the public who now have a more affordable reason to buy hydrogen fuel cell-powered vehicles.
7) Car makers make $ selling cars AND the fuel they run on
8) Domestic auto industry profits & jobs go up
9) Pollution & transportation costs go down
*Invalid Link Removed
"...Bourgeois's prototype electrolyzer cuts the equipment cost of using electricity to grab hydrogen from H2O. The key was replacing tooled metal with a moldable, high-tech GE plastic called Noryl, saving on materials, manufacturing and assembly. The result? A kilogram of hydrogen -- the energy equivalent of roughly a gallon of gas -- that costs $3 instead of the current $6 to $8. "I could imagine a small box that sits on-site making hydrogen for a factory," Bourgeois says. "Eventually, even filling stations may make their own hydrogen."..."
I offer this sketch in the hope that it will provoke better suggestions on how to make this work.
Platinum is an important component in the fuel cell electrochemical reaction. It is also a scarce earth resource that could be prone to shortages.
More nuclear plants would have been a better use of that money.
That leasing idea is interesting. Increased efficiency of solar panel technology will have to happen, as many locales don't see much sun. This will happen over time. More nuclear plants are a must. Wind is over-rated, but works in some areas.
What's potentially more efficient?
Improved solar ---> electricity ---> improved batteries in cars
Improved solar ---> electricity ---> hydrogen ---> car
Hmmmm.....
http://www.carseek.com/articles/hydrogen-fuel-cell-car.html
So how much platinum is needed per car?
Map: Where it's found
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
The whole green tech development & adoption issue seems to be a Catch 22 which will require innovation on all fronts to achieve a beachhead towards a predominantly green economy.
As for less sunny locales, this development is interesting:
Spray-On Solar-Power Cells Are True Breakthrough
Stefan Lovgren
for National Geographic News
January 14, 2005
"Scientists have invented a plastic solar cell that can turn the sun's power into electrical energy, even on a cloudy day.
The plastic material uses nanotechnology and contains the first solar cells able to harness the sun's invisible, infrared rays. The breakthrough has led theorists to predict that plastic solar cells could one day become five times more efficient than current solar cell technology..."
Good! The widespread global adoption of hydrogen fuel cell-powered vehicles, and the corresponding increase in demand for platinum, could lead to an economic boom for troubled South Africa/a vested interest on the part of other governments to encourage stabilization in that region.
The research that goes into solar cells is pretty interesting. We just need to try and get the efficiencies up
...and although cars need better efficiency for environmental reasons for sure, buildings use 40% of the world's energy, which is a staggering piece of the pie given our advancements in technology over the past 50 years
Indeed! On this matter, I'm eager to see where geothermal tech will be in twenty years.
if you are interested in geothermal, you might take a look at this project i did along with a team of sustainability-minded engineers and landscape architects for a competition--utilizing a geothermal 'hotspot'
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
this concept actually went beyond net zero to becoming an energy producer
Depends on how you drive it. If you commute 15 miles and charge every night it can probably do 200mpg or actually a lot better than that. If you drive it cross country, not so much.Does that car live up to the pre-release hype of ~200 mpg?
Does that car live up to the pre-release hype of ~200 mpg?
Not many years ago the prospect of commercially viable 500 - 900 Watt RMS bass amps weighing ~4 lbs. and sporting power supplies in the 90% efficiency range seemed improbable as well...