I have only ever owned solid state amps. But I want tubes, and to me Ampeg is the paragon of tubes.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I have only ever owned solid state amps. But I want tubes, and to me Ampeg is the paragon of tubes.
Everytime I play with my Fender MIA P-bass and my Ampeg SVT-CL + 8x10 my guitarists and sound engineers complain and say it's too boomy and sounds bad. Almost everytime. My settings are mostly flat - and this is with new strings aswell.
Am I cursed? I'm not sure I see that fantastic Ampeg tone anymore. I mean, it's very suitable for rock, but if I want to improvise during a rock song people probably won't be able to hear me because it's muddy. This has been my experience anywho, probably not the case of others since Ampeg has a pretty good rep. I guess.
Everytime I play with my Fender MIA P-bass and my Ampeg SVT-CL + 8x10 my guitarists and sound engineers complain and say it's too boomy and sounds bad. Almost everytime. My settings are mostly flat - and this is with new strings aswell.
Am I cursed? I'm not sure I see that fantastic Ampeg tone anymore. I mean, it's very suitable for rock, but if I want to improvise during a rock song people probably won't be able to hear me because it's muddy. This has been my experience anywho, probably not the case of others since Ampeg has a pretty good rep. I guess.
Everytime I play with my Fender MIA P-bass and my Ampeg SVT-CL + 8x10 my guitarists and sound engineers complain and say it's too boomy and sounds bad. Almost everytime. My settings are mostly flat - and this is with new strings aswell.
I've been to most venues I think. Really big halls, small halls, reeeeally small pubs, outdoors .. I don't think there's anything wrong with the amp, because in band rehersal it sounds pretty okay (I still would prefer some extra clarity, though I know at those freq. it's hard nevertheless).Where is the venue? Some spaces require cutting between 30-80 hertz.
Jimbob
Mid-selector has been on 4 most of the time. I'll try 2 and 3. Do you think there's a big difference? I haven't really noticed that much of a difference.
Watch for a V4B or a Traynor Mark II (YBA-1A) or any of a lot of old off-brand 100 watt bass tube amps. The SVT is nice and all, but boy is it a lot to schlep and a lot to maintain. A V4B will get a lot of use and help you decide if you really need that SVT. You'll probably break even if a previous owner has done a cap job and tube replacement for you within the last couple of years.
100 watts in an old tube amp with good transformers is a respectable amount of power and a joy to play.
Even my Mark II is ~45 lbs. Weight means good transformers though, so don't chump out on it.
KO
Something has happened to the 810E's speakers along the way. They've made them more capable of handling lower freqs but they've made them boomy and not near as full-range as they used to be. Still a favorite cab of mine but the ones of the past few years sound much boomier than the older ones.Everytime I play with my Fender MIA P-bass and my Ampeg SVT-CL + 8x10 my guitarists and sound engineers complain and say it's too boomy and sounds bad. Almost everytime. My settings are mostly flat - and this is with new strings aswell.
Am I cursed? I'm not sure I see that fantastic Ampeg tone anymore. I mean, it's very suitable for rock, but if I want to improvise during a rock song people probably won't be able to hear me because it's muddy. This has been my experience anywho, probably not the case of others since Ampeg has a pretty good rep. I guess.
Somehow or another, tubes have been inappropriately tagged as being only for players who like distortion, while nothing could be farther from the truth. Yes, they can distort, but that's one minor aspect of their appeal. I like their clean tones way better, too.