"Have a love for something" is simply a touchy feely way of saying there's a demand for it. There's a love for Corvettes. That's why they sell for 60 grand. There's a love for good wine. That's why it's a car payment per bottle. There's a love for diamonds....
Musical instruments are no different from any other commodity. They are inanimate objects. They are things that some people covet. I care exactly zero for inanimate objects. That's why I can flip them without writing a poem about it or going to see a therapist.
So, are you saying that one's affection for a given object should have an effect on the price one pays for said object? I reeeeeeally love Corvettes so I should get a vintage one for less than some evil Corvette collector who only buys them to look at and sell for a profit????? Geeeeeeez. Where's that planet?
A '59 P bass is a thing. It's an object. It's not a holy relic.
I'm not sure where all that came from! What I said is simple: it's just a shame that people who have a genuine regard for something because it's beautiful/cool/exciting don't get a chance to enjoy that thing because it gets priced beyond their reach. I also said that it's a fact of life. This is further getting off-topic now: I never intended to open a discussion about the merits of the free market.