I like it a lot. It is freestyle & some legits will critique that but don't give up on your dream yet.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
@Bainbridge You seriously have given the best constructive criticism (specifically form which was the biggest problem with the piece) that ive ever received musically and I would like to thank you and insist you make a extremely comfortable living doing so. As for how I want to approach music scholastically is still a subject of debate but any and all knowledge of music is what im striving for..if you have suggestions I would be more then open to them.
@bainbridges next comment in the thread
Your points reflect my thinking exactly. Back to my extended metaphor id like to be able to use a larger toolkit when building my music. Something I think studying music at a higher level will provide me.
One of the better things about music school is the immersion that you experience. You'll be in a program with a bunch of other musicians with the same goal, and all of your coursework is relevant to the goal of making and understanding music. I could teach you a few years worth of composition and theory classes in a few weeks, but I couldn't replicate the environment of having hundreds of friends and classmates following a music curriculum. It's a good place to make friends.
Hahahaha that was a great counter argument. Although I didnt know that, Miles davis a big influence on me (probably most musicians).
Miles knew what was up, and while true, that phrase has a lot of weight on it. Any note is accessible at any given time, but it comes with the stipulation that you know what to do with the harmony. For example, D as a melody note over an A major triad is a dead wrong note. If you hang out there and end your phrase there while that same chord is going, it will sound really awful. Make it a part of a line like C# D E, or the retrograde of that (E D C#), and you'll be fine, because D is surrounded by the "right" notes there. I might add to those words by saying, "There are no wrong notes, just poor decisions."
He is a great teacher and person, which is why this email stung a little. I think the harshness was motivational so I credit him.
I had a few discussions like that, and while they arrested me at the time, getting it straight ultimately helped me to proceed.
@bainbridge again!
I will start working on other pieces and post them in different threads following the requirements that are expected. Again your advice is extremely helpful and im going to PM you as soon as I start another thread so I can get some of your advice on there.(whether you do is entirely up to you though haha)
Please do. Your piece reminded me of the first movement of this piece: Invalid Link Removed
There is a lot of play on the timbre of the instruments there. The form isn't very tight (at first everything comes together in the fourth movement), but the composer is purposely suspending formal organization for the effect of meditating on a question.
I'll try to be honest without being brutal. I had difficulty listening to your recording; for me, there was no "there" there.
Imagine you were trying to describe your "composition" to an educated/accomplished musician who had never heard your recording. What words would you use? How would you describe your song using standard musical terminology?
What kind of language might a music professor use to describe your "composition" to a class full of music students?
Meter signature
Rhythmic structure
Modality
Choral progression
Melody
Phrasing
Dynamics
etc.