• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

I NEED HELP... GIBSON vs FENDER

I want to buy a new bass im looking to spend between 1500 - 2000 , its either gonna be fender or gibson, that i know for sure but i dont know. Ive played a couple fenders and they sound F-ing great but stores rarely carry gibson bass's so ive only got to play epiphones and of course an epiphone is not a gibson, so i still can't compare gibson to fender really. I wanted an SG in the beginning but as more time goes on im not sure about that short F-ing scale, its so little, the les paul bass looks good ive read some decent reveiws on it, but ive never heard an actuall gibson bass. Fender ive got nothing but good things to say about thyere bass's but gibson i dont know. so my question to you is who makes a better bass ,when it comes to blues, rock&roll and ect, overal$l what bass should i be buying
 
the Lp is a great Bass for rock & Blues but can be heavy. A Tbird lacks upper fret access. Both are pricey

You can't go wrong with a Fender, but everyone has one. There is a reason why.

I would by used either way, what ever you get. You can get a great $2000 - $3000 bass used for $1500

A lakland, MusicMan or G&L might be a better choice
 
Is there a reason that you are limiting yourself to just Fender or Gibson? There are a lot of really good basses in that price range. I A/B a Gibson SG and an Epiphone SG. The Gibson was just shy of $1,500. The Epiphone was $200. I couldn't tell a difference in sound, fit or finish. It's not the the Epiphone was so great, it's more like the Gibson didn't look like it should cost what it did. I've owned three of the new Fender American Series (2008) Precision Basses and found fit and finish problems with all three. One had electronics issues and rough fret work. I've also owned a Mustang and one of the '51 reissues. I had no problem with the '51 and liked it okay.

You have a lot of options at the range you are talking about. After much trial and effort, I ended up with a MusicMan and a Warwick. I can't get the MusicMan to sound like a P Bass, but the Warwick can sound like the Fender and then more.

If I just had to have a Fender, I would buy the CIJ '51 Precision Bass over anything else in the lineup. If I just had to have a Gibson, I would probably buy one of the $800 faded LP series bass. I wouldn't spend a $1,000 plus on either brand.
 
Although Gibson of course makes basses, and I don't want to dis anyone's Gibson bass, but I think of Gibson as more of an acoustic and electric g*#tar company. At your price range there are a billion really cool basses to choose from. I'd slow way down and do lots of research.
 
The Gibson EB-3L (long scale SG bass which you probably won't find in stores for that price) is better than any fender.

other than that, a good ol' precision is the best bet. i love the mustangs but they're the same scale as the sg basses which doesn't seem to be your thing.
 
I want to buy a new bass im looking to spend between 1500 - 2000 , its either gonna be fender or gibson, that i know for sure but i dont know. Ive played a couple fenders and they sound F-ing great but stores rarely carry gibson bass's so ive only got to play epiphones and of course an epiphone is not a gibson, so i still can't compare gibson to fender really. I wanted an SG in the beginning but as more time goes on im not sure about that short F-ing scale, its so little, the les paul bass looks good ive read some decent reveiws on it, but ive never heard an actuall gibson bass. Fender ive got nothing but good things to say about thyere bass's but gibson i dont know. so my question to you is who makes a better bass ,when it comes to blues, rock&roll and ect, overal$l what bass should i be buying


Go get what you really want. Not what others tell you.

That said: Go get a Gibson. :bassist: