Originally posted by tyburn
yeah it does, theres absolutely no reason why any technique applied to bass guitar should cause you to even have blisters, if you take your time and do not wack the $hit out of your bass, not only will you have a better sound, technique and more control over what your doing , but you'll also have NO blisters.
even with things like fingerstyle playing, what do you people do that causes you to have blisters, i see posts like "how many blisters do you have", like its a contest!?
nothing, the majority of the time, is added to the sonic value of a note, when you wack it silly, sure some stylesand songs, for instance, Jacos part on the chicken, require you to modify the posistion and the way in which you strike the string.
but i've never had a blister, perhaps a bit of hardened skin, i've always played with fingers, never a pick.
listen to what your playing, if it sounds bad to you, then whats everybody else goning to think when it's increased in volume by 300W
theres no reason, in my mind why you'd want to sound and play just like flea, the technique isn't exclusivly his, nor is he the best at it,
once your playings getting good, you want to be looking at how you can make yourself stand out from the crowd, work on modifying techniques, doing things differently, thats why the fleas, jaco's, vic wootens etc, are mentioned , they do things a little different than there predecessors
sure, lokk for inspiration, but don't get caught up in the "flea is god" stuff, it's not worth it, nor is taking advice , like "wack the strings, it'll sound like $hit and you'll have lots of blisters"
be objective and sensable with what you listen to, and if your still not sure, ask some of the TBers who are a little more mature.