• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join free Log in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

IEMs with true stereo?

#21
Ampslut said:
You have to go with LOW LATENCY BT. like used for the TV to sinc with BT headphones. If the latency were too high then people's mouths wouldn't match the action. Some BT transmitter like the Hosa I have are close to 1/2 sec latent and definitely would not work. But, Xvive is making BT wireless devices that many people are perfectly happy with.
Click to expand...
Works one-way as I said. 2-way with BT is too slow for live audio, even w/ BT v5. If you play and sing and need to monitor real-time BT ain't quite there yet.
Another reason not to try it is - it runs in 2.4G spectrum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Geri O, Gustav_over_net, mcnach and 1 other person
#22
s0c9 said:
Works one-way as I said. 2-way with BT is too slow for live audio, even w/ BT v5. If you play and sing and need to monitor real-time BT ain't quite there yet.
Another reason not to try it is - it runs in 2.4G spectrum.
Click to expand...
I think we are still a few generations off from Bluetooth being a viable option I'm hopefully optimistic tho I'm already seeing wifi 7 being released and I just upgraded to wifi 6e and I thought it was blazing fast. Things are starting to progress fast lately.Im hoping for a Ai based frequency management program to come pre installed on new wireless stuff next
 
  • Like
Reactions: s0c9 and Gustav_over_net
#23
Ampslut said:
You have to go with LOW LATENCY BT. like used for the TV to sinc with BT headphones. If the latency were too high then people's mouths wouldn't match the action. Some BT transmitter like the Hosa I have are close to 1/2 sec latent and definitely would not work. But, Xvive is making BT wireless devices that many people are perfectly happy with.
Click to expand...
i don't think this is right; "low latency" bluetooth is still like 30ms, totally unusable for live playing

BT audio devices are for listening to playback, something where you're not trying to sync up your own playing to it
 
  • Like
Reactions: mcnach and s0c9
#24
walterw said:
i don't think this is right; "low latency" bluetooth is still like 30ms, totally unusable for live playing

BT audio devices are for listening to playback, something where you're not trying to sync up your own playing to it
Click to expand...
I've been using an Xvive U2 (bluetooth) wireless system for a couple of years now. Specs say 5ms latency.
I can feel a little difference between the Xvive and a cable but, nothing I can't live with.
Play Free with the U2 Guitar Wireless System - Xvive
 
#28
seamonkey said:
The ultimate 3d mix: About - KLANG
Not cheap, but it is amazing.
Click to expand...
the other "no compromise" 3d mix system is the sensaphonics, it avoids all that crazy computer simulation spatial processing by letting you hear the actual surrounding sound change when you turn your head because it puts ambient mics right on the earbuds themselves
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom
Back