i've been perusing a lot of threads lately in this subforum, and have been apalled at the level of incomplete and just plain wrong answers being offered by people under the guise of being fact.
if you do not know what you are talking about, do NOT offer an answer to someone's theory question. that does not help anyone - in fact it goes a long way to hurting the discussion.
from here on out, the moderators in this forum are going to be given wide lattitude in correcting/deleting misinformation, and if someone is found to repeatedly post incorrect assumptions about music theory, this will be considered trolling.
discussions are fine. offering "assumptions" or "guesses" as actual "music theory" fact is -NOT FINE-. music theory is a quantifiable, learnable, knowable topic. LEARN IT, KNOW IT, LIVE IT. and THEN post about it.
.
if you do not know what you are talking about, do NOT offer an answer to someone's theory question. that does not help anyone - in fact it goes a long way to hurting the discussion.
from here on out, the moderators in this forum are going to be given wide lattitude in correcting/deleting misinformation, and if someone is found to repeatedly post incorrect assumptions about music theory, this will be considered trolling.
discussions are fine. offering "assumptions" or "guesses" as actual "music theory" fact is -NOT FINE-. music theory is a quantifiable, learnable, knowable topic. LEARN IT, KNOW IT, LIVE IT. and THEN post about it.
.
