• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Impressed with Warwick hardware!

So I've never been a huge fan of Warwicks. Their necks are too thick for my tastes, they're heavy, and their aesthetics aren't my thing either. A shame, since I think they sound pretty good.

Anyways, last month my buddy picked up a Warwick Corvette standard and he got a great deal on it. However, it desperately needed a setup, so he came to me asking for help.

Now, I just spent the last hour or so giving it a thorough setup, adjusting relief, nut height, string height, pickup height, and intonation. It was my first time working on a Warwick, and I have to say, after having owned 20+ basses at one point or another, Warwick hardware has to have some of the best, most adjustable hardware around!

A nut with adjustable height? Bridge that has height adjustable saddles, as well as an overall bridge height adjustment with locking set scews? Locking saddles? I never really understood the need for a two piece bridge, but it works on the Warwick and I have no complaints, especially since it's a quick release bridge for easy string changes. Also, I liked the truss rod cover with the quick snap-off "lid." It's a nice touch compared to leaving the hole exposed or right under the neck like many fenders that can get the pickguard marred when trying to adjust it.

Does anyone share similar feelings about Warwick hardware? I think back to the countless hours I've spent doing setups on Fender-style instruments (including the Sadowskys, Fenders, G&Ls, and Musicmans), and how tedious it can be, especially when adjusting neck angle to compensate for a bridge that doesn't leave enough for lower string height, or something like having to sand down the nut or cutting deeper slots in the nut.

I still won't buy a Warwick any time soon, but it was awesome working on one. They're built really well, and these adjustment features made the bass so easy to setup really well. In no time at all, I was able to make this Warwick play better than many of the boutiques I've worked on!
 
Warwick is light years ahead of everybody on design. Love the quick access control panel and just-a-nut.

Not sure why you'd say they have thick necks and are heavy...sounds like you've never really played one. My Streamer Jazzman is just the opposite of what you think Warwicks are like.
 
Warwick is light years ahead of everybody on design. Love the quick access control panel and just-a-nut.

Not sure why you'd say they have thick necks and are heavy...sounds like you've never really played one. My Streamer Jazzman is just the opposite of what you think Warwicks are like.

I'm sorry, my comment was regarding all the Corvettes and Thumbs, and the one Streamer I've played. I apologize for the generalization. They were indeed heavy, and necks were definitely chunkier than the average bass. Nothing wrong with that, just not my thing!
 
I'm with you on the nut and bridge, but the tuners, not so much. The headstock is too thick for them and they only grip with about two threads which strip then the tuner is loose. I actually bought it new like that. They are cast threads too, not machined. I saw it as a design flaw and not a defect so I didn't have it replaced under warranty. I eventually replaced all the tuner machines with lightweight hipshots which improved the balance too.
 
Warwick is light years ahead of everybody on design. Love the quick access control panel and just-a-nut.
As well as the quick access truss rod cover on newer Warwicks

Not sure why you'd say they have thick necks and are heavy...sounds like you've never really played one. My Streamer Jazzman is just the opposite of what you think Warwicks are like.
+1
Warwicks made of bubinga are heavy, but that doesn't mean that all Warwicks are heavy.
 
It's kind of typical German fashion. Way over engineered, but it all makes perfect sense when you want to adjust it. Every tweek is available so you can get it as close to perfect as possible. Good stuff.

You hit it right on the nail! As I was working on it, I was thinking "wow, a lot of thought went into the design of this hardware." For a tinkerer that likes to work on cars and motorcycles, I appreciate these features!
 
OshKoshJoash said:
I'm sorry, my comment was regarding all the Corvettes and Thumbs I've played, and the one Streamer I've played. I apologize for the generalization. They were indeed heavy, and necks were definitely chunkier than the average bass. Nothing wrong with that, just not my thing!

Nope, they are thick and heavy. Got a funky hump in the neck too but even that's there for a reason. I just never cared for the string to string response. On all the ones I have played (german) the thinner strings are loud and zingy, the lower strings lack definition imo and are boomy. They just don't have the same attack and Response across the strings to me. Not that that's a bad thing, you just have to decide if it works for you. It does for a lot of folks, so what do I know. Just my .02
 
OshKoshJoash said:
You hit it right on the nail! As I was working on it, I was thinking "wow, a lot of thought went into the design of this hardware." For a tinkerer that likes to work on cars and motorcycles, I appreciate these features!

Yep gotta love it. You can spend hours tweaking that bass of you want to. The woods are real rigid as well so when you got it there it stays.
 
I've always been impressed with Warwicks hardware and sound. The weight on the German models that Elderly used to have were very high though, abet bubinga's standard weight. I could never afford one thought. Aside from the adjustable nut, all my basses are easy to work on with Hipshot hardware.