• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Is it vital to have 2 PA speakers?

fdeck

Supporting Member
Commercial User
Mar 20, 2004
18,699
21,504
Madison WI
sites.google.com
Disclosures
HPF Technology LLC
I'm sure it depends on the intended use. This would be for jazz combo gigs at relatively low volume in small venues, where the keyboard and bass tend to be either acoustic or self-amplified, and a PA is only for reinforcing a singer or horn player.

I've got the pieces to assemble a simple PA with one lightweight speaker.

My question is:

Is it vital to have two speakers? What would be the harm of having just one speaker on the bandstand? Of course I'm tempted to try it regardless of anyone's advice. :D But I always welcome both technical and practical knowledge, and I know that there are TB'ers with much more expertise on sound reinforcement than I have.
 

Huh? Where did you get that idea?
huh.gif


Regards,
Wayne A. Pflughaupt



Pedulla Club #45
Administrator, Tobias Club
Big Cabs Club #23
Pedulla Club #45


 
Hi.

IME, it's better to have one decent speaker than two or more crappy ones. I'm one of those people who has done "single point" PA gigs as well.


Yup – stereo PA systems are a stupid idea.

Regards,
Wayne A. Pflughaupt




+ 1000

i agree, and yet, all pa systems are stereo. what gives???

:D

My guess is that the STEREO hype has just stuck from the early days. In fact, there's a lot of mixing desks that don't label the main outs as left and right.

Stereo is not the way (creative ;)) sound engineers think about the two main outs. To them they're just two semi-independent (pan control) outs. Usually one is used for the mains, the other one for other purposes.

Regards
Sam
 
Just because there are left and right spkrs doesn't mean a system is stereo.
I'm running a big PA that's fully stereo-capable in mono these days.
Except for being able to pan some guitar to the off-side (away from his loud but awesome Mesa Boogie) I can't really think of a good reason to bother with stereo.

With speakers, it's always a coverage thing.
Some rooms need more stuff to help everyone hear the music correctly.
If you can fill the room with one cabinet, go for it!
 
It'll work well to have a single PA main if you know its dispersion angle and plan accordingly. The challenge here is getting uniform volume throughout the room with a single speaker.

What tends to happen is with the normal angle of even a good quality PA cab (90 degrees or so, maybe 110-ish) you're forced to either have dead spots or set it on one side of the room and aim for coverage (and also have it farther away from the audience). Doing the latter means you're going to have it be a little quieter on one side of the room (ranging to much quieter in a very big room).

So tl;dr: You need to tell us more about the design you're using. If I was going to use a single speaker solution I'd recommend you go with one of Bill Fitzmaurice's designs, myself. They are excellent at filling rooms from one spot.
 
My question is:

Is it vital to have two speakers? What would be the harm of having just one speaker on the bandstand?

It is often quite difficult to get both good monitoring and good house coverage with just one cabinet. My last jazz trio worked with no monitors most of the time, but we often used two cross-fired cabs in front to allow the diva and the keyboard player to hear themselves. In many cases only one cab was really covering the room and the other one was essentially a monitor. Worked fine for us.
 
:D I bet 90% of the stereo mixers out there used for PA have everything panned to the center..

Yep. The only thing I typically use the stereo function for much is effects, which IMHO and IME often sound exponentially better that way. It is also pretty useful to have independent EQ on each side of the FOH stacks.