I like this guy's clip, but the other 2 using the same bass I'm not so into.
Makes me appreciate the B3k and makes me want an SVP-2pro to go along with my SVP-CL.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
...one's a tuner lol.
In my country it's actually common place, the burden of the guitar and bass amps, DIs, all cables, and microphones is all on the sound guys. It must be much less stressful to be a soundguy in North AmericaAt some events I've mixed at, some guys don't even bring a 1/4" cable with them.
God gave you ears attached to a brain that can analyze pitches LOL.

K eepI've always had the absolute best luck with a minimalist setup.
Bass > sansamp > tuner > amp. That's it.
So long as you're not pushing tons of effects, there's literally no point in getting more complicated than this. At least that's what I've found. The simpler, the better.
Thoughts?
There can obviously be more minimal, but a sansamp is a best friend and a tuner is...well, a tuner.
I'm more trying to communicate the less is more message, and I'm wondering if anyone disagrees. I've seen countless bassists on stage with a full pedal board of stuff.
I never have a tuner in the signal path..my ampeg head has a tuner out on the back panel..if you have an amp that doesnt have a tuner out..you can use the effects send to go to the tuner..I don't even leave a tuner plugged into the signal path. I find checking the tuning once or twice during breaks in the course of an evening gig more than enough.
I've always had the absolute best luck with a minimalist setup.
If you think less is more, you really should try more. It’s way more than less. That’s why it’s called “more.”
There is no implicit benefit to using less gear in all given situations. Go to a pickup gig with just your Sansamp and you’ll have less weight to carry and less things to potentially go wrong. But if they call out Tool’s “Lateralus” and you’re left without being able to emulate the numerous effects the bass uses in that song that really brings it to life, then you’ve ruined the song. The situation dictates what is better to have, not an idealistic approach of “less is more” or “bring everything plus the kitchen sink.”
I’m not saying you’re doing it but I’ve seen other people brag about never having used any effects in 30 years of playing. All that tells me is that they’ve either played a very limited amount of styles or they have actively made songs worse by their refusal to use different effects or techniques. It’s like a chef bragging about never using salt. Some meals are flat-out better with it.
I don't even leave a tuner plugged into the signal path. I find checking the tuning once or twice during breaks in the course of an evening gig more than enough.
If you think less is more, you really should try more. It’s way more than less. That’s why it’s called “more.”
There is no implicit benefit to using less gear in all given situations. Go to a pickup gig with just your Sansamp and you’ll have less weight to carry and less things to potentially go wrong. But if they call out Tool’s “Lateralus” and you’re left without being able to emulate the numerous effects the bass uses in that song that really brings it to life, then you’ve ruined the song. The situation dictates what is better to have, not an idealistic approach of “less is more” or “bring everything plus the kitchen sink.”
I’m not saying you’re doing it but I’ve seen other people brag about never having used any effects in 30 years of playing. All that tells me is that they’ve either played a very limited amount of styles or they have actively made songs worse by their refusal to use different effects or techniques. It’s like a chef bragging about never using salt. Some meals are flat-out better with it.