TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I prefer something in between the your examples; good musicians playing well, in time and together.I liked the tune! Personally, I enjoy the loose, real sound of a band...warts and all...over an auto-tuned, over produced, 48 tracks, Pro-Tools, perfect song with no soul or feeling. It's like a cherished, blurry old polaroid photograph of a person that means something instead of a glamorized, every blemish touched up, fake selfie that's not real.
We live in a hyper-fake world and too much fake stuff is being pushed out. Still some great stuff out there but you have to seek it because corporations are saturating us with a lot of polished garbage. Ha!
I prefer something in between the your examples; good musicians playing well, in time and together.
I definitely agree regarding the sanitised pop we hear a lot of these days. The melodic intervals have also been reduced to formulaic simplicity that is monotonous. I have no idea where music will go in the future but I get the feeling that this type of wrung-dry-of-spontaneity pop music will not be be looked back on favourably.I like the Zombies and recently saw them in concert and they can still play and sing great!
Oh and I definitely appreciate and enjoy virtuosos. For example I have seen bands like Yes and Pink Floyd in concert and they have also crafted (almost) perfect albums without all of the digital trickery.
My point was that track from 1965 was more enjoyable to me then a lot of the “perfect”, auto-tuned, sterile tracks cranked out to the masses today.
A lot of those songs are so digitally enhanced they start sounding the same to my ears. The problem today is if a song doesn’t have auto-tune slathered on the vocals or instruments the listener thinks there is something off about the song.
I've not seen Bordertown -- a quick search sez "Finninsh crime drama." Sounds interesting to me -- I will definitely maybe give it a look..
This post relates to "Black Winds" by Little John and the Monks (from ?1965).
I heard this track on "Bordertown" last night. It is the closing track for Season 3, Episode 3 and I found the music on YouTube.
On YT, there is a comment by Rixster, who claims to be the co-author and bass player on the track. I take the comment at face value as being legitimate. Inter alia, Rixster said, ". . . I played bass; if you listen close, I really sucked at playing bass."
I rather like the bass. What do you think?
I was going to mention the film Smilla's Sense of Snow, but that has to do with Greenland, not Finland (saw it ages ago -- more than a little fuzzy on the details, now!).The English over-dubbing is horrible and the 'acting' of the teenagers aspires to reach the level of horrible. Those issues aside, it is a less than average series; however, I'm watching it because I've never before seen a series from Finland. I enjoy seeing the sights and learning a little more about the country.
If I watch it, I'll go for subtitles, if available.
I don't grade on a curve, and I calls 'em like I sees 'em. You like them? Great, enjoy!Whaddya expect for a mid-60’s teen band somewhere in the sticks who probably only played a handful of gigs?
Seriously?Listen to "Wish It Would Rain" by the Temptations. Nearly all root notes, pretty sure it was Jamerson.
It sounds pretty rough and loose to me. Not that good really. This was also from the ‘60s. There’s a world of difference.
I don't think Jamerson has ever overplayed, but hey, opinions.I didn't say he always overplayed.
Yes, in 'i wish it would rain' , I don't think the bass overplays.![]()