Hey guys! I've been offered a great deal on a "baroque" bass. The seller claims it to be over 100 years old and as I've examined the pic's, it seems it may be so! What do you think?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
powerbass said:I'm no luthier but the neck looks a little off to me. How is the neck joined to the body - it doesn't look like it attaches into the bass body via a mortise or neck block.
It does not give me the impression of being a masterfully-built instrument though, but it might of course still sound & play well. Instead, the shape of the lower left-hand side (top pic), as well as the scroll, rather gives me the impression of somebodies first pass at making a double bass. But of course I might be totally wrong.
If they ask any significant money, get it checked-out - or gamble as you like.
I think I see metal tuning pegs (nice tuners actually!), and old basses often have wooden pegs (but not always), for low tension gut strings. Wear on the worm gears is an indication of age.
The mottled finish on the back looks too intentional or antiqued.
Exactly, it looks more like folk art or an amateur's hack job, although the neck and fingerboard look professionally done. If it is old, the tuners could have been changed out at some point, who knows if the scroll is even original to the bass?
It stands to reason that some poor instruments would survive just as quality ones have.
Exactly, it looks more like folk art or an amateur's hack job, although the neck and fingerboard look professionally done.
Eric Hochberg said:Which may mean it sounds good. Why else go to the expense of a new neck/FB? Some of those Swanson basses that are crudely made are supposed to sound great.