Hi,
thanks to every one for the replies. I spoke to the supplier today to question whether the older JCs are solid maple and he said that "maple" might not actually mean "solid maple" in older descriptions. Epiphone are calling it "layered maple" now but it could be that the JCs were never solid maple. EPI are also saying that it helps eliminate feedback so they might also be trying to use the "layered maple" description as a selling point now but didn't before. I have emailed Epi and if i get a response I will post it here. My assumption at the moment is that they are all "layered" and always have been.
Thanks also for the info on bridge set up that looks straightforward enough. The jack socket issue might be a bit of a pain but at least feedback doesn't seem to be an issue.
thanks to every one for the replies. I spoke to the supplier today to question whether the older JCs are solid maple and he said that "maple" might not actually mean "solid maple" in older descriptions. Epiphone are calling it "layered maple" now but it could be that the JCs were never solid maple. EPI are also saying that it helps eliminate feedback so they might also be trying to use the "layered maple" description as a selling point now but didn't before. I have emailed Epi and if i get a response I will post it here. My assumption at the moment is that they are all "layered" and always have been.
Thanks also for the info on bridge set up that looks straightforward enough. The jack socket issue might be a bit of a pain but at least feedback doesn't seem to be an issue.