TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Dig. Sorry if I cast aspersions on your intentions, bro. When you put it that way, it sounds a lot more appealing to a dude like me. Wish I had seen your first post in this thread when you wrote it. All the best with the book and your future endeavors.
Sorry but learning a player's style doesn't mean you want to be a clone. You can create your own style from it.Jaco is not a must for everyone. I spent 5 years playing bass before I even heard of Jaco. Jaco was fantastic, but being a Jaco clone does not appeal in the least to me. What appeals to me, however, is learning from the sources that Jaco learned from, which were mostly from other instruments.
1. Ancient thread.Sorry but learning a player's style doesn't mean you want to be a clone. You can create your own style from it.
Well I guess it demonstrates how important Jaco is for the bass world.1. Ancient thread.
2. When I read the author's explanation about it 8 years ago, it made a lot more sense to me, as you can see in my subsequent posts.
3. I still think there are too many Jaco clones out there.
I still think there are too many Jaco clones out there.
OK OK!!! Sheesh!So, if I think there's too many Jamerson clones out there. does that mean people shouldn't study Jamerson?
It's a personal musical journey. People should freely study who and what they want without having to explain or justify it to random and inconsequential people. Having said that, I suppose it's OK for those random people to feel however they want.
Lol, Sorry... Those type of comments make me feel some kinda way... Like they say in Baseball... "Let the kids play"OK OK!!! Sheesh!
Hey All,
As there seems to be a certain lack of understanding here regarding the Jaco book in question, I'd like to clarify things a little.