Yes its more neutral sounding than some amps. The B-15 comparison is misleading to me as I've said before, because a B-15 head, on its own, is also a neutral-sounding head. That cabinet is another story.
I'm finding that the Sisma and my WD 800 share some similarities as both use the same Baxandall tonestack, and variable mid controls, two on the Sisma, three on the Mesa. The Sisma has a little bump in the Bass at a flat setting, reminding me of my GK 1001RB, the Mesa has a passive mid-control that changes or adds mids to the flat setting of the amp. I can get one to sound like the other with minor EQ tweaks.
Can I get it to sound like other amps, like a SWR or an SVT? I don't know without having them here to try. Maybe, as a lot of it to my ear is whether the amps in question is naturally scooped or lively in the midrange and whether its trying to be tube-driven or not.
Then there still persists the cabinet questions. An SVT sounds different running through the 810 vs not, that changes the perception of these things.
Does it have the note weight of older amps? I think it does, but I find my Mesa WD 800 does as well even though its class D, some disagree with that assessment. I find the WD just as weighty, pehapes the D+ more so. There are some tonal differences but more nuanced than striking, again to me.
So if you think the Sisma is going to sound like a Portaflex in any other cabinet, its not. Just like a B-15 head doesn't sound like a Portaflex in any other cabinet.
I's is going to sound like a kickass amp?
Yes, yes it is.
But that's just me, in this moment in time.
PS I find the audio examples on their website indicative to what I can get here in person.