well, thand, your friend Jimmy made it a big deal when he wrote "don't get too wrapped up in the minutiae"; as if anybody was wrapped up in anything. you're exaggerators trying to support one another. i can read music or improvise music in any genre - why can't you? I see you have nothing constructive to add either. and by the way, your least powerful trait is obviously logic, because if you read what you wrote, with a critical mind, you'd see that it says very little, except that you agree with your brother Jimmy. Both you and edwardG agree with Jimmy that bassists should not analyze the music of the great ones. you don't see the big deal, but you make a big deal of saying that it's not a big deal, LOL! in fact, you even post comments based completely on that weak premise without having anything interesting to offer. i don't like to say that you're boorish, but... and hypocritical, because everything you play on your bass has been played before. i mean, none of you are Carol Kayes (as Jimmy said "she is an angry older person who can't stand the thought of anyone thinking differently than her). Sounds a bit like you three, don't it? Have you ever thought that maybe you're just jealous of a generation of achievers who created all the music and left none for you? and i suppose you think that classical musicians are also wrong because they can play an artist's work exactly as he intended it to be note-for-note? what a cop-out. in your world, it's illegal to study Bach or Beethoven at a conservatory level. try to sell that line to the upright bassists. they'd laugh you out for being so short sighted. in fact, the question begs to be asked, do you people even read music, or is that, in your words, too "minutiae" and "fools errand"? before you defend your brother, you should determine if he is right, all right?