I could see some folks with deep pockets and an insane crush on the great JJ go for it, but I would challenge anybody in a blind test to guess between this and even a Mexican P with Pure Vintage pickups, not to mention in a band context.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
You'd probably be able to feel the difference, but sound wise you may be right.I could see some folks with deep pockets and an insane crush on the great JJ go for it, but I would challenge anybody in a blind test to guess between this and even a Mexican P with Pure Vintage pickups, not to mention in a band context.
And how would that be the same except for the color? Is every precision bass shaped instrument with sunburst exactly the same?+1. You can get an American Professional Classic Precision for 2,000 Canadian $$ less at Long and McQuade. I call cash grab.
I think you're right. Maybe they set it up with a bowed neck, impossibly high action, and 15-year-old strings?Ive always been under the impression that Jamerson played a stock, off the shelf, 62 P.
Other than some cosmetic stuff, what makes these any more of a James Jamerson bass than any other 62 sunburst P repro?
Every single bass made varies in weight. Shop somewhere that lists weights, done.These are nice. I just wish they were lighter. It seems the average weight is 9.5 lbs, though i've seen 8 lb outliers
But WTH, does any young person who's not an out & out bass nerd like us seeing a 'James Jamerson Bass' know who they're talking about? Like the kid in Sam Ash one day who asked me, 'Paul McCartney was in a band BEFORE Wings?'.
But if ONLY these things worked as advertised: I'd buy one in a hot minute that if by buying it, I could instantly play this:
Everyone knows Jamerson played stock Precisions. The supernatural magic was him. But they drop the hook and people bite, took the bait. I'd just as soon buy the Squier CV Precision, add the ashtrays and a tweed case and flats, I'm good. AND have enough money left over to buy an amp !?!
View attachment 7524585
CV 60's Precision Squier. Ashtrays, maybe a Fralin or Antiquity pickup, a nice tweed case. The JJ Fender is SIX times better than this. Uh-huh. . . . .
Those are still way less than the JJ.Do you understand it’s positioning in the lineup? Do you see the current price of the American vintage II?
They are $500 less. Again, it’s not that hard: relic, premium strings, premium price for a limited edition bass. Is there any other bass on the market that has a relic treatment, made in USA with same specs that’s cheaper?Those are still way less than the JJ.
You see, for me, a 62 Precision, either original or this reissue, is nothing special to me. It certainly may be just the ticket for someone else. At rough count, from Affinitys to limited run custom shop pieces, FMIC currently has 32 Precision Basses on offer, and I'm sure some Dealer Exclusives and Fender.com Exclusives that boost that count.This IS a "stock" 1962 REISSUE. Where else can you get a relic'd, USA made, nitro finished, 1962 reissue for $3K? I'll wait...
If in fact, you do not WANT a 1962 reissue with a relic finish, then you simply move on from this product and check out one of Fener's other dozen or so Precisions. Easy. Super easy. If you find that a Squier does it for you then you have absolutely no problem here.
Doesn’t matter. If it makes a difference to the buyer, then nothing else matters.I could see some folks with deep pockets and an insane crush on the great JJ go for it, but I would challenge anybody in a blind test to guess between this and even a Mexican P with Pure Vintage pickups, not to mention in a band context.
Welcome to runaway capitalism.You’re right about one thing, it’s a crash grab just like every product
One way to look at it is anyone today wanting to buy and off the shelf 1962 P is going to pay a lot more than $3k. If that's what someone wants, this looks like a nice deal.Ive always been under the impression that Jamerson played a stock, off the shelf, 62 P.
Other than some cosmetic stuff, what makes these any more of a James Jamerson bass than any other 62 sunburst P repro?![]()
Wow! $3k? For that price, it should include the original strings, from '62, with Jamerson's grunge still on them?The $3000 price tag validates it in the eyes of collector with more disposable income than common sense.
Any other explanation for a mass-produced $3,000 3TS with tort p-bass in the year of our lord 2026 is laughable.
JJ's p-bass was a bog-simple tool that a uniquely talented master of the instrument used to do his thing, the tool itself 1) wasn't this (objectively) and 2) wouldn't have been something he fetishized like this. Cynical cash grab, I hope his family/estate at least gets something from it.
What did you experience with the weight of these basses ?I played the new Fender James Jamerson bass in Nashville today. This bass has some serious mojo.
I played four other Precisions ranging from $800 - $2,500 in the store. The Jamerson sounded the best!
Now I don’t need another bass, but if I was going buy one, I think I would pony up for this one.
I am not sure about the weight. It felt good and solid like most P Basses.What did you experience with the weight of these basses ?