• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Just got a 61 Jazz from a friend

Well… just got the whole story. I live in Seattle so I was able to go down to Emerald city guitars [the instruments and amplifiers they have there is insane].
They disassembled the bass for a full inspection
64 neck. Approximate value $2500
65 pickups new leads so possibly rewound. Approximate value $1000
Body NOT Fender :roflmao: Approximate value $ 00
Who cares about the body, you got the important parts right! Very nice bass. You could do a refinish on the body, upgrade any non-OEM parts, like the pots and/or the bridge, and not lose any value.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stephen
What I heard (back when working in a Fender warranty shop) was that Fender first called the 1980s reissues "62" (rather than, say, "60") was the fingerboards switched from slab to curved construction in '62 so it left open the option to switch if they later decided to.

I think I read that it was a marketing decision, to keep the naming in line with the 62 P, and 62 Strat. Likely both are true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dynacord
I think I read that it was a marketing decision, to keep the naming in line with the 62 P, and 62 Strat. Likely both are true.

Certainly true to keep it in line with the others. Also, my understanding (coming from the warranty perspective) was there was concern in the early 80s about possible neck warping with going back to slab boards. A common misunderstanding with the move to curved boards was that it was Leo being characteristically cheap, but the early curved boards used no less rosewood to begin with as the boards were milled to shape, not bent. It was to address returns and thought to be more stable. Clearly a more complicated and expensive process than just gluing two flat surfaces. So, by calling them "62" they could switch if it became a problem.
 
Certainly true to keep it in line with the others. Also, my understanding (coming from the warranty perspective) was there was concern in the early 80s about possible neck warping with going back to slab boards. A common misunderstanding with the move to curved boards was that it was Leo being characteristically cheap, but the early curved boards used no less rosewood to begin with as the boards were milled to shape, not bent. It was to address returns and thought to be more stable. Clearly a more complicated and expensive process than just gluing two flat surfaces. So, by calling them "62" they could switch if it became a problem.
Now THAT’s ^^^ interesting!