I think the original passive Shadow pup does sound better than the new U-Basses with the sketchy preamp.
The passive Shadow sounds good plugged into an amp directly as long as the amps input impedance was high enough. My Aguilar Tone Hammer amp, for instance, sounds great plugged straight in.
I do, however, advocate using a proper preamp. First off, in case you don't know what amp you will be using & it is likely necessary to make a di sound good. I've tested and used many units in my home studio, in pro studios and on the road. My favorites for the passive U-Bass (in my personal preference order) are:
-Fishman Platinum Pro Bass: it has a 'baked-in' eq that works really well with the U-Bass, has the most flexible eq, built in DI, adjustable high pass filter and full patching capabilities.
-Fishman BII beltpack: simple 2-band eq that is very effective and proper buffering.
-Fdeck Series 3 hpf/preamp: compact like the Fishman BII, but instead of eq you get a really good adjustable high pass filter. In my testing, the Fdeck and Fishman BII sound 99% identical.
-Radial PZ-Pre: A very clean, clear sounding preamp and di. The hpf points are set a little too high, but the eq is effective.
-ART Tube MP: Really! It's input impedance mates well with the U-Bass and the tube circuitry actually does warm it up slighty. No eq, but can also function as a di. A cheap but effective solution!
I've also used the following with good results, just not ideal for U-Bass applications:
-Groove Tubes Brick tube di
-Aguilar DB-900 Tube DI
-Aguilar Tone Hammer DI (sounded good, just not perfect)
-Neve console with 1073 preamps
I did not like the U-Bass with the following:
-Avalon U5 (noise and weird eq for U-Bass)
-SansAmp BDDI (buzzy and unnatural)
-MXR M80 DI (impedance sounded off)
-Radial JDI (the passive di needed a preamp badly)
This is all based on a lot of touring, studio work and extensive home testing with my U-Bass.