Hello everybody!
I am new to this forum. And although I have started reading this thread in its entirety, I am only on page 27 of the 1st megathread, so it will take me some time to read through it all

Forgive me if the questions I am asking here have been asked and answered before. I am currently in a situation where I need to decide between two fretless mahogany U-Basses and I am not sure which one to choose.
I have both at home right now with the right to try them out for 30 days. When the first one arrived, I was immediately in love with it and wouldn't put it down for the rest of the day. It was a used model that sold at 150 bucks less than the original price. Unfortunately, the E string has a way lower output when amplified. I know that others have had this problem, and Stephanie from Kala immediately replied to my email with suggestions on how to re-set the pickup for more pressure on the piezo. (Do you know of cases where the piezo simply wouldn't deliver an even output of the strings, even after restringing the bass with the piezo "forced" into its ideal position? I have not done it yet because the instrument is still the seller's until I decide to indeed buy it.) Besides the output of the E string, I find it suspicious that the seller (a renowned company for instruments here in Germany) hasn't managed to sell it otherwise. And it was quite dusty when it arrived here. The serial number indicates that the model was fabricated in January 2013.
So, the second model (new, manufactured in July 2015, full price of EUR589) arrived, and I also liked it, but somehow I didn't fall for it as immediately and fully as with the first one. I noticed some minor manufacturing flaws, such as the varnish on the neck feeling less smooth, some glue (?) sticking out between neck and fretboard, a light stain on the fretboard (looks as if the fretboard was oiled sloppily and this part didn't get any oil), the toad logo being cut-out sloppily (this one is purely optical, I know, but still...). This bass has definitely received less love and care during production than the first one. And, most weighty of all, the neck has a different shape and diameter. (Do any of you know why Kala changed the neck shape between 2013 and 2015? Was there a specific reason? Or was this maybe not even deliberate and it's a mere case of production variation?) It does not fit as snugly into my hand. I feel my left hand slightly hurting after playing for a while. Maybe the muscles in my hand still need to get used to the shape (I am not very experienced yet with basses, I am only starting out). But I don't have this issue with the older model. The neck of bass no. 1 and my hand seem to be a perfect match. The upside of the new model is that all strings output with the same volume. But I notice slightly less of this wonderful thump sound that the first one has.
What would you do in my case? I already asked the first dealer about the string output and they offered me to send back the bass and get it checked by their guitar tech. They actually have a luthier department, so I guess I could trust them with this. But I still wanted to ask you experienced bass players your opinion on this case. What do you think?