• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Kiesel's lack of bass evolution

I'm still kicking myself for missing out on some nice Carvins that popped up a while back.

Anyway on topic, Kiesel lets you do almost anything if you're willing to have a non-returnable instrument. (If I'm understanding it correctly) The examples you gave with the headless models and etc are already too weird for a lot of traditionalists to handle, so I'm not sure how much more you'd want to push it.
 
I’d just be happy if they’d be willing to fix the broken truss rod on my XB76. Or at least respond to my email.

I've gotten the impression that they don't really do those types of repairs anymore, and it was never something that they wanted to advertise in the past given the labor involved in stripping down a neck-through bass to remove the truss. If the bass is under warranty they'll usually just build a new one, and if it isn't under warranty they might begrudgingly do it if they aren't too busy but they'll charge too much for it to be worth it. I would recommend that you reach out to Martin Keith Guitars (on TB as "Keith Guitars"), since they did a great job with a truss rod replacement for my old LB70 at a fraction of what Kiesel was potentially willing to do it for.
 
I’d just be happy if they’d be willing to fix the broken truss rod on my XB76. Or at least respond to my email.

They will do warranty repairs and that's about it. When you say XB76, I'm assuming that's a Carvin bass? Carvin is a different company than Kiesel and has been for a few years. They're making a much higher quality instrument now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mechanical
Let's face it - innovation has hurt the big guys. How much did Fender, Ernie Ball and Gibson spend on research, development and tooling for the Dimension IV and V, EB4 and EB5 and redesigns, and Big Al, Gamechanger and Reflex basses only to have short production runs? Updating and tweaking existing designs is a safe way to keep products fresh without a prohibitive cost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikewalker
Anyone else notice Fender's lack luster efforts to come up with new designs? The "new" models are just re-treads or re-configurations. When's the last time they introduced a new through neck model?
There! I fixed that for you!
It's obvious you meant Fender.Not Kiesel.
 
Last edited:
Never been a big fan of Kiesel, but this looks pretty innovative and modern and I like the crap out of it.

C0153C88-E150-4442-8068-F664535B81A2 (1).jpeg
 
I think, if you want to take a shot at lack of innovation, the fact that this thread was started with the exact samne question aimed at Kiesel as another thread with that question aimed at Fender has to be recognized.
 
Anyone else notice Kiesel's lack luster efforts to come up with new designs? The "new" models are just headless re-treads or re-configurations. When's the last time they introduced a new through neck model?
Calling ********. Kiesel introduces tons of new models and tons of new options all the time. And the latest neck-through model is a month old.

Designing a headless guitar isn't the same as cutting off a headstock and calling it a day. It's a totally different instrument.