What can you tell about comparing the quality/craftsmanship of basses made from these countries, from your experience:
- Korean-made vs Indonesian-made?
- Indonesian-made vs Chinese-made?
- Korean-made vs Chinese-made? (i think you dont need to answer this part
)
Thanks
Well...
I'd have to say that the answer is
very much "it depends". I have basses (and some guitars) that were made in all 3 locations. They range from the late 1970's to a couple of years ago; and, when they were made, is most definitely a factor.
Basically, the progression from "cheap, beginner" basses that were... playable, but not really gig-worthy, to basses that are
very well made; worth every penny of their not inconsequential price; and get gigged a
lot, has been Japanese > Korean > Chinese > Indonesian. And, IMO? The quality
vs. price curve has been blurred in the last 2 decades by the rise of CNC-made bodies and necks; automated pickup manufacturing, and the drop in wholesale price of at least decent hardware. The realization that good quality control is necessary - and worth the expense - hasn't hurt, either. CNC machines don't care where they are... So...
Bottom line? If you're looking at new basses? All of them make good basses, that are worth what you pay for them. Indonesia and China still make inexpensive "beginner" basses, but they make other, very well made basses, too. Japan? They've been out of that market for quite a while; and, so - pretty much - has Korea. These days, you can be pretty confident you'll get what you paid for - and expect, no matter where the bass is made...
