• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass Lack of EUB plans: own design started

76115BC1-368E-456F-890E-53D4BFF7E770-2894-00000394D7B7E389_zpsfec06c15.gif


Getting there but not right yet. An in between?
 
The curvature of your original design (posting #41) is nice, specially on the top (where it is important), but I would prefer a a bit thicker rib like in the last right drawing and with a bit of a bottom part (think like this part would have been a cutout of an acoustic double bass without the top part) which also makes it more stable.
I think this is most important for holding it securely.

The lower bout is not needed for a bass when standing and when sitting it is the bottom needed, not the rib. I would drop that part. If you want a cello the lower rib is important, but this is a bass and holding it is totally different from a cello.
 
If you move the bridge, you also move the interval at the end of the neck which is a major orientation point for a double bass player. So, if you don't want to (re-)learn two different neck scales, better decide which scale or neck scale you want and fix the bridge.
Otherwise you need to make you nut moveable too (but then you loose the half position neck orientation point).

+1
 
With tumb on lowest neck position the tone on the G string is equal on the lower Eb on the D string with an octave difference of course.
I presume I'm on the save side!?

check this video we DB players use the neck heel as an reference point, if an important concept once you know there is D or Eb on the (G string) , you can find out where is C, B or E, F ect, the other strings I think is more common to have a D on the heel position.

 
Thanks!
I tried to retune it to a D neck but it didn't work out. Seems logical to me. The length of the neck didn't change or am I thinking wrong.

Got a piece of bendable ply and made a jig today. Hope three layers of 5mm would do the trick but it is extremely bendable. Glued them up with hide glue so it needs a decade to dry.
1FCD8FB1-1CD1-4713-AEDB-F0081EA982F5-2773-000003B05E3258F5_zpsd012a26d.jpg
 
For a D-neck, your total vibrating string length needs to be much longer than with the Eb-neck, probably around seven or eight centimeters longer if you want to use your neck as it is.

Most necks are made for a 105 cm vibrating string length and a D neck. Those made for an Eb neck on 105 cm need a really long vibrating string length of around 112 cm when a D neck is the goal with this neck.
 
9EE58109-AFE3-4036-9419-C4F866FFB413-4215-0000059DFE963A50_zps577218a2.jpg
F6CBA9FE-B795-4B61-9DB2-4E1B91FC2FB3-4330-000005AD082860C2_zps1e375180.jpg

Best design ideas come spontaniously! After building a one of my earlier designs I came up with the 2nd pic! How cool is that!
All Ikea designers eat your heart out! Very scandinavian looking don't you think! Danish designpiece!!!!
Ah well, not bad for a dutch guy. I'm very happy with it! Have to remake one piece which is pretty easy so one hurdle less to take!
 
Put something arced at the lower end of the upper bout (lke you did at the upper end of the lower bout), so that it wouldn't bend. I like the right design much better than the left one. So you can use the lower bout if you want and can omit it if you don't need it.

Could habe been danish design, but IKEA is swedish...
 
I like the look of your bass. Here's how the detachable neck is joined to the body of my 70's eub. I've had this bass for 21 years, and it's held up fine.

I like the upper bout in post #41. To me, it looks like part of the overall design. The others (once again, to me) look added on.

Good work!
 

Attachments

  • eub neck 2.jpg
    eub neck 2.jpg
    31.6 KB · Views: 117
  • eub neck 1.jpg
    eub neck 1.jpg
    21.2 KB · Views: 152
How simply could it be!
For the next project I probably use this method.
Depending on the result I consider to build a closed semi acoustic version of this one.

I like the #41 design also but it was a bit to classical for me. For an open version I'd like it to be more modern. For a close version I agree with you!