TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
So, it must be YOU behind the Burning Earth bass design then! you know, the [Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
no "free space" on the top.....it is working its way BACK from the forhead....each time I get my hair cut I notice it more and more......and the hair cuts are longer in between.....
Now guys, I have this idea: what if I change necks between the basses? that would make a alder/maple 55 JJ-CS fretted and an ash/rosewood* 55-94 fretless, thus balancing the highs and low mids on the fretted and adding more versatility to the fretless. Some of you huys have interchanged necks, did that need any fit work?
* I think rosewood, just as I thought ebony. The wood is dense and the color deep and integral, but those tiny cracks make me think choice-grade rosewood
nope....He did not do that.....Lakland had another "design" guy at the time...
I have more pics of the bass if you would like to see them....
Re: Pole Pieces: When I started to do that mock-up I tried to use this photo. But the angles were wrong, didn't work even with a lot of manipulation.
Interesting. I didn't know anything about MMEs, but it looks like a pickup that Bartolini used to make (but have now stopped). Am I right ?
I like the idea anyway, though in neck position, with 3 choices, I think I might go for J(closer to neck), P, J(further from neck) ... or even just J/P.
You could do something similar with a Nordy mm5.4, except the split there is BE/ADG. You could (I guess) turn it upside down.
On a similar theme, check the Link Removed. NOT a drop in replacement for anything.![]()
We're talking about a radical set of mods on a 55-02/94 here ... could seriously devalue a 55-94
Andy
Hey all you Lakland owners, I'm in the market for a new fiver and I'm considering the 55-02 or perhaps the 55-94. I've just got a couple of questions after watching these videos:
What are the main differences between the skyline series and the US series?
It looks like all the adjustments and electronics and such are still done in house for the skyline series, but is the quality of the wood, hardware, etc. cheaper then the US?
I'd love to buy the US series, but I just want to justify spending the extra cash.
Any help is appreciated, I'd really love to hear some sound samples of both models too, if anyone has some on hand.
I may do that! Also, if someone had a nicely priced set of used J5s, that may work as catalyst for my R&D...Some neck pocket/necks vary, but give it a shot. When I tried it...it worked perfectly, and was super simple.
Yeah...I wouldn't do that to a US Lakland.

Yeah...same electronics...done in-house. I think the thing you will notice is the neck. Both very nice...but the US neck uses better woods, and feels better in my opinion. Whether that is worth the extra money...that's up to you. If possible, I would play both. They are going to sound about the same.
nope....He did not do that.....Lakland had another "design" guy at the time...
I have more pics of the bass if you would like to see them....
You'd just have to make them from scratch.
So Mr. Doude, care to shed some light on what Woody's replacement may be?
Just don't tell me it's this guy:
Invalid Link Removed
you guys keep on making vague clues about some delicios(o) italian food in Chicago, so why not, a LOG specialty in one of the Mexican restaurants sounds great
sure! I wonder how they are wired/switched
...and then you make a call to Carl...